My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00027
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:16 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:06:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1990
Title
Final Report Rio Grande Water Supply Study, Phase 1
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
San Luis Valley Water Conservancy District
Description
Reconnaissance level determination of the physically and legally available flow at 4 reservoir sites in the Rio Grande Basin upstream of Del Norte, Colorado
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />111.2 GROUND WATER ADMINISTRATION <br /> <br />Ground water usage complicates water administration in the Rio Grande Basin. As <br /> <br /> <br />previously indicated, the hydraulic connection between the surface water system and <br /> <br />the confined and unconfined aquifers is not well defined. Due in part to this <br /> <br />uncertainty, the drilling of irrigation wells, today, is restricted by the State <br /> <br />Engineer's Office. Since 1970, no new well permits for new appropriations have been <br /> <br />issued for the Closed Basin confined aquifer and any aquifers outside the Closed <br /> <br />Basin. Since 1981, no new well permits have been issued for the Closed Basin <br /> <br /> <br />unconfined aquifer. <br /> <br />The State Engineer proposed rules in the late 1970's which would have curtailed <br /> <br />well diversions unless individual well owners could prove that either their wells <br /> <br /> <br />do not injure senior rights or that sufficient water augmentation plans are in place <br /> <br /> <br />to protect the senior rights. Litigation over the proposed rules and regulations <br /> <br />resulted in a decision of the Colorado Supreme Court (Matter of Rules and <br /> <br /> <br />Regulation, 674 P.2d 914, Colo. 1983) which remanded the rules and regulations to <br /> <br /> <br />the State Engineer for further consideration. Meanwhile, Compact administration <br /> <br /> <br />continued as before. <br /> <br />Since the Supreme Court ruling, water users in the basin have worked together to <br /> <br /> <br />resol ve many of the issues which prompted the State Eng ineer I s proposed rules. <br /> <br /> <br />Agreements signed in 1985 between representatives of the major San Luis Valley water <br /> <br />users allowed for distribution of water from the Closed Basin (see Section V for <br /> <br /> <br />a discussion of the Closed Basin Proj ect) and continued ground water pumping. <br /> <br /> <br />Since these agreements address some of the major issues involved in the rules and <br /> <br />regulations remanded to the State Engineer, new rules and regulations have not been <br /> <br /> <br />proposed by the State Engineer. <br /> <br />111.3 SURFACE WATER ADMINISTRATION <br /> <br />The potential reservoir sites at which water availability was investigated in this <br /> <br /> <br />study are located in an administrative region referred to as Water District 20 or <br /> <br />District 20 of Water Division No.3. District 20 includes the headwaters of the <br /> <br /> <br />Rio Grande and the Rio Grande mainstem to its confluence with the Conejos River as <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.