PUB00015

• Year: 1998
• Title: Stewardship of Colorado Stream Corridors
• CWCB Section: Watershed & Flood Protection
• Author: CWCB
• Description: Statewide River rehabilitation and floodplaim needs inventory
• Publications - Doc Type: Tech Report

I

I

I

Need

I

I

I

Figure 3
FUNDING IMPLEMENT A TION

. Lack of Funding
. Did Not Have A Funding Mechanism
. Desire Funding
. Planning Assistance for Planning and Implementing

Preferences

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

60
~
..
,
E
E50
o
u
.
E
~,g 40
o ~
&.0
~ 0
~ 0.
~~30
o "
. !
.8 0
E 0
:i ~ 20
e
o
E
~ 10
.
"'
..
.
~

Funding Mechanism Preferences

o

I

I~
. . '" '"
C m 0 .~ E
m "
~ u. ".
0 o .-
OJ ~ , ,0
u. u.'
. "'
=> ~ - 0
m ~
m 6~
"
m
u.

II
.0
o.~
"0
Be
Om
8~
- 0
u. "
0.
E

m
'"
.
o
"iij 00
- m
Om
EU.
a
iij

.g
t;
alB
.0-
.0
" m
2 E
. m
J::;r
o
.
"

.,.
.u
m
0.
'"

x
.
f-
~
.
=>

.
'"
.
o
~~
E=>
a
iij

'"
o
..
~"O
~ '5
a::u.
. 0
".
.~ .9
1ii
iij
Type of Funding Mechanisms

Note I: 36% of respondents stated a lack of funding was the primary ohstacle to planning and implementing
improvements,

I

Note 2: 70% of respondents stated they did not have a funding mechanism or had an ineffective funding mechanism.

I

Note 3: Other preferences include Loans, No Tax-Based Funding, State Funding, Cost Share Program, Go Co
Money, Capital Projects.

I

I