Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. Won't protection or basin-of-origin legislation cause more waste <br />of public and private monies, as Front Range cities scramble to find <br />"politically acceptable" water supplies? <br /> <br />8. (Also addressed to Mayor Carpenter) Economic vitality is the <br />focus for the Front Range while environmental protection and basin-of- <br />origin protection is the focus for everywhere else (rural eastern <br />Colorado and Western Slope). Economic development (i.e., water <br />development) must be looked at for the Western Slope. <br />Telecommunications, etc. will make rural economic development very <br />possible within "basins of origin." Where does rural economic <br />development (real development) come in, in lieu of buy-offs, etc. <br /> <br />9. Does your remark concerning more involvement by the state in Front <br />Range water needs mean your support to dismantle the Counties 1041 <br />powers? <br /> <br />10. Would the state support stream-lining the legal system by limiting <br />the "can and will" doctrine? That doctrine is being used by opposers <br />to litigate every issue which could affect water projects, not just <br />those relating to the water riqht which system is intended for? <br /> <br />11. Would state support reasonable limits on HBI041 so that local <br />governments in "basins of origin" can't veto water transfers, or <br />impose unreasonable mitigation costs? <br /> <br />12. What steps will your administration take to stop and clean up <br />water pollution from industry (e.g., cyanide toxins from mining) to <br />protect rural aquifer and surface streams from ruin? <br /> <br />13. Do you see any chance of public funding for water rights purch~ses <br />to provide supplies for the instream flows, habitat and other public <br />trust uses? <br /> <br />14. How serious is the CWCB (state) in using their funds for other <br />areas of water development rather than specific dam projects? These <br />smaller, more individual rehabilitation projects often create more <br />water quicker and more efficiently. <br /> <br />15. How can the state help individual water users (cities, irrigation <br />companies, etc.) fight the federal bureaucratic red tape such as the <br />Forest Service, EPA, etc. in a more effective manner? The federal <br />government seems to ignore our state rights in water matters more and <br />more. <br /> <br />16. Colorado needs to educate its residents especially the <br />"transplants" to what made and will continue to make Colorado, WATER! <br />.Storage and water management are a must in this state, and they need <br />to hear it day in and day out until they understand. We in the water <br />community hear it all the time, but we understand the issues. Get the <br />press, TV, radio involved more as "part of their community service." <br />They also need to realize where their food comes from, and it is the <br />American farmer, and water is the key to food production. <br /> <br />17. What is your position on the recently proposed "Water Salvage <br />Bill"? <br /> <br />9 <br />