My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00006
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:38:48 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:58:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Colorado's Historic Water Projects
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Applegate Group, Inc
Description
A calender with pictures and descriptions of historic water projects.
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Peter E. Barkmann <br /> <br />properties of the stratigraphic layer made up of that litho- <br />logic material may result in different hydrologic properties <br />of that layer that actually affect the hydrodynamic charac- <br />teristics of the aquifer system. For example, there may be <br />crosscutting stratigraphic relationships with other facies in <br />the interval increasing hydraulic connection across layers <br />and therefore increase the overall vertical hydraulic con- <br />ductivity of the interval. Similarly, bioturbation or fractur- <br />ing from diagenesis could increase vertical hydraulic <br />conductivity of the interval on a scale larger than measured <br />by the small core sample size. There is also the possibility <br />of tectonic fracturing and faulting that should not be dis- <br />missed in a synorogenic basin. To date, faulting has not <br />been identified within the central portion of the Denver <br />Basin on a scale that could increase vertical hydraulic con- <br />ductivity across the confining layers, but the possibility <br />exists that tectonic fracturing is present. <br />Data from pumping tests conducted at multiple-aquifer <br />pump facilities in Parker during May and December 2000 <br />indicate that, locally, there is little vertical connection <br />hetween the aquifers (Barkmann and Edington, 2001). Pro- <br />duction wells completed in one Denver Basin aquifer were <br />pumped while water levels in wells completed in the other <br />Denver Basin aquifers were monitored. Water levels in the <br />monitored wells did not decline during pumping of the <br />nearby wells where the dynamic water levels declined as <br />much as 200 ft in response to pumping for up to 48 hours. <br />Although these results apply to a short time period of <br />testing and are limited to a small geographic area, they do <br />indicate limited vertical hydraulic connection between the <br />aquifers consistent with very low hydraulic conductivity in <br />the separating shale intervals. <br />With the considerable variability observed in the results <br />of vertical hydraulic conductivity analyses on this limited <br />set of data points, what can be said about the amount of <br />vertical groundwater flow in the Denver Basin? These val- <br />ues provide a steppingstone in analyzing the system. They <br />give end values from which to begin asking questions and <br />with which to validate modeling efforts. Most importantly, <br />the data suggest that the vertical hydraulic connection <br />between the principal aquifers and within the aquifers may <br />be very limited, changing the concept of how the aquifer <br />system as a whole will behave as exploitation progresses. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDmONAL DATA <br />COllECTION <br /> <br />The limited set of data reviewed here certainly begs for <br />more research and, as always, additional raw data from a <br />wider distribution of sites. Additional topics for research that <br />should help resolve the uncertainty in the results published <br />to date include, but are not limited to, robust analysis of <br />grain-size distribution as well as degree of compaction of <br /> <br />The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists <br /> <br />samples analyzed for hydraulic conductivity. Much of the <br />core remains preserved for future analyses, although, over <br />time, the natural hydrologic characteristics of that material <br />have likely changed as a result of mechanical agitation and <br />dehydration. <br />Additional core samples should be collected over a <br />broader distribution across the Denver Basin. As future <br />core sampling efforts advance, the following details need <br />to be considered in order to obtain representative data: <br /> <br />· For core handling and hydraulic conductivity analytical <br />procedures: <br /> <br />· Follow standardized sample handling procedures to pre- <br />vent dehydration and mechanical agitation of the samples; <br /> <br />· Follow standardized methods for sample analyses, using <br />water as the testing media; <br /> <br />· Use native formation water; <br /> <br />· Perform detailed lithologic description of the samples, <br />including grain size distribution and compaction analyses. <br /> <br />Topics for additional investigation: <br /> <br />· Clay mineralogy studies of the fine-grain sediments as <br />well as the interstitial clays in the coarse-grain sediments; <br /> <br />. Determination of formation water composition in the <br />fine-grained sediments; <br /> <br />· Investigation of clay-water interactions and possible <br />changes to clay structure in both the fine- and coarse- <br />grained sediments resulting from changes in water <br />chemistry. This will be particularly vital as artificial <br />recharge with non-native water is implemented on a <br />large scale across the Basin; <br /> <br />. Compaction studies of the fine-grained sediments rela- <br />tive to position in the Basin and potential maximum <br />depth of burial. <br /> <br />· In situ testing at a number of sites across the basin using <br />multiple piezometers completed in individual sandstone <br />layers while pumping from deeper permeable layers. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br /> <br />The author wishes to acknowledge all those who <br />assisted, either directly or indirectly, with the preparation of <br />this article. In particular, thanks go to Dr. Robert Raynolds <br />for suggesting its inclusion in this issue of the Mountain <br />Geologist. The Parker Water and Sanitation District, Camp, <br />Dresser, and Mcgee, Inc., Mark Palumbo of HRS Water Con- <br />sultants, Inc., and Mr. Glenn Graham of the Division of <br />Water Resources graciously provided date incorporated into <br />this report. The author is especially grateful to Dr. John <br />Halepaska, Dr. Bob Raynolds, Mr. Andy Horn, and Mark <br />Longman for reviewing the manuscript. <br /> <br />182 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.