Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Peter E. &lrknU/I/II <br /> <br />SPDSS Core <br /> <br />The Colorado \'\~\('r Con",en:ation Bo:ud i~ Clmemly <br />implt'm('nting it:-; South Pbtlt., [)tXi~ion Support Systl'm <br />(SPDSS) to better mana~t.' surhee :mJ ~round\....:.uer within <br />thl;" South Pblle Riwr Ba,.;in (C\\"CB, 10lJ-.l l. A:< part of the <br />Rroundwarer com(Xmenl of the SPDSS, Camp Dre,o,;er and <br />:\kKee (CO:\D, Inc. drilled a hed[(l('k te"'l well in Oltober <br />2003 at a sile north of Herlnt'tt, .-\Jam.... County I FiR I) to <br />obtain aquifer pmpt."rty and configur.uion d.lt:! and 10 e....al- <br />uate the intt'raction I>t'{\\'l~'n the Dem.t.'r Basin .Il]uift~r" and <br />tht' South Plalle allu\"ium (CD:-.1. 20(4). TIll" loc;Hjon is <br />approximardy 42 miles from the western l--tl,>.:e of the north- <br />l'fll part of the Basin when.' tlll..' aquife~ are nO! a." deep <br />and the upper Ikn\'er ;md Daw:<on aquifer.'i arl" ah-'o\.'nt. <br />Core::s were oht."lined from three :<eparatt.' ime[\'ab at <br />depths of 125 to 2.6 ft in the 100\'t~r Den\'er :lnd uppt'r Ara- <br />pahoe aquiFers. Two samples of Fine-graint"d :<emi-consoli- <br />dated claystone were :<elt-cted from the cores for labor.Hory <br />analysis of \'ertical hydraulIC conduni\'jty (CD,\1. 200'i). <br />The objectl\'e was to determine \"<mical le,lbge ehar.lltl.'r- <br />btie;. with emphasis on pu:-.sihle hydraulic nmm:nion <br />between the Dl'nver Basin J-x'drock a4uifer and the o\t.'rly- <br />ing South Platte allu\'ial aquifer. CD?\112(K}I) took .~reCi;11 <br />care in handlin~ the sample" 10 pre\'l'nt ddlyd,.Hion and <br />Illechank'al agilation of thl..' finl.'-gr.lined "edinwnts, <br />The sampll's were an;llyzed hy Core L,b Petroleum ~I..'r- <br />\'k'es for liquid penneahility in :lcnmlinu' with API RP-'IO <br />mt:'lhtxJs (API. 1960l lJ~ing formation watel prll(l\leed from <br />the Ar.lp:II}(x' aquifl'r at the I..'nd of a pumpin~ tl;.":-.1 (CO,\1. <br />2004), Form~llion water \\',1-" u~t"d ;l.~ the satllr.lting medium <br />to minimize tilt' pOlential for \'Olllmdric chan~e:< in day <br />mineralogy and slrul'lllre hy the introduction of wakr of <br />diffl'rin~ chemi:-.lry, ;I~ identified with the Parker COfl'''. The <br />resulL'> of analy."i:-. for vertiol hydr.llllic condunivity from <br />the two ~amples nJlIected of fint~-~r.linl'd confinin~ in!er~ <br />vals atlhis location are on the order of -'l.-xW-6 {O 3.5xlO-l'l <br />cm/sec (Tahle 3), which arl' lower than the resulb <br />reported for the Kiowa core, }'t:t hight'r than [t'J')()rted for <br />the Parker cort'. Core handlin~ ;lOd analytical methrxb <br />dosdy followed thoSt' impll'menll'd at Parker. with the <br />exception of the u~e of natin' formation watt'r a.,> thl..' ~"IIU- <br />r.ltinR media. However. thl' s;imple... from the :-;P[)SS ..itl.." <br />were also ohtained from mueh ~hallower depths in the <br />Bhin, wht:'rl' the synorogenic "l.'dimt:nt," may ha\'t: nen.'r <br />t>t'en subjected to the "ame depth of hurial as nl'ar the <br />deept;"sl pan of the B:l.sin. <br /> <br />DISCUSSIO:\' <br /> <br />The current .~et of empIrical vertical hydraulic COndll("ll\" <br />it)' me'.l.suremeOls reprl'.~enl a \'ery ..mall :<amphn:;:: of a \-'ast <br />}.:l.'ologic feature. not only hOrlzom:dly ;Icrn:<..; ;I n<;,arty <br /> <br />The Rock}' .\IOllfll"," A...."OCW1I<>n 0/ ('<'0101<:'"'' <br /> <br />6iOO-mi~ b:l~in. but abo Hc'rtically through ,I 3000-ft thick <br />"t'diml'mary 'it:'llion. On a map na.,I:<, thert. arc only nve <br />set'> of da[.I: and of those fh'e ~l.", tht' maximum numtx'r <br />of vel1ical J.1ta point:- with :<pt'dllL" rcfcrt:'Ol"C [0 finer- <br />gr.lined t-onnning layers h 22. TIli!<> is ;! \'ery ..mall d:lla ~l.'l, <br />~iven the importance of thh rl.'."ourt"t.. and the rail' al whith <br />it is hdng exploited. <br />E\'en with the limitt:'ll "ize of thi... data ~L the range of <br />\";triahi1ity amon~ the result.'> is lar~e. sp:mning from lxlO-;I. <br />10 Ix1O,II {'nv:<t'C as shown ~IJphil-Jl!y in Figurt.;. Typi- <br />cal h\"draulic nmduL"lI\'it\" values for ..bak LlU helow b;;lo-7 <br />un'-~~c while \'alue::s f(~r silt r.mge hetween IxlO-5 and <br />lxlO-~ l'nt'~C (Freeze and Cht.IT)'. 19~9). Some of this <br />\';uiahiliry m:l)' be :H1rihuWhle to difference,.; in the physical <br />propel1il.'... of [ht:' f()(:b .";Udl as litholof0 rd:ltive to the <br />~OUrte area. Furthermore. not all of thl: \";llut:'s Ii,,,tt.--tl in <br />Tablt' j and :<hown in Figure 7 are from sampll:s that arc <br />nect'ssarilv shall'. TIll:ft' could ;tl~) he;- diffl'renn~s in physi~ <br />cal propertit's of the f(K:ks owing to diffeft.'m'l:s in com- <br />pall ion hi:<tories th;ll m.IY nOl he uniform a~'fO~S tht.' Basin: <br />not all shales .1ft." the: ....amL.. On the ntht:'r hdnd, some of <br />thl' \'ari.lhility in an;llytical results prohably arhl's from dif- <br />ft'rencl.'~ in mt'thods. hoth from the st;ll1dpuint of sample <br />handling .lOd J.nal)licaltechniqul". :\Iost of thtc" results Ibll.'d <br />aho\'l' lxlO'- cm/see art' prohahly not of tht' shale confin- <br />in,s.;. Jayers or are nm rt'pn.'sentali\"l' due to discrepancies in <br />s:lmple h:mdling and ll.'sting metlllxb. <br />During evaluation of the P:lrker core, JCHA conducted <br />sensiti\'ity analyses of tilt' analytical methods on .-.e\.t:'r:ll of <br />thl.' sample:< The firsl analysi.~ l'onsistt'd of pt:rformin~ <br />replicatl.' analyo,;e,,, usin,l.: the sallle ffil.thlxb and saturating <br />mt"llium on the samt' samplt'S in order to measure variahil- <br />it~. witblll the ~anw lllt'thoJ, while tbt. second sl'nsiti\-it)' <br />analysis con....lsted of comparing ;lOalrtk;J1 r('sull'i from <br />ll:<in~ watt'r and comp;mn,g them with the an;ll)tic;J1 rl.'.'iult.... <br />from the same -"ample llsin,s.;. a differenl meth(x1 with air :1." <br />the satur;uin~ ml'diutll. The:: rl...sults of hoth "erl.~itivitr analy- <br />"l'~ (Table -I) art' revealing and gin" a M.'rL"il' of how critical <br />the ~dection of ml'thcxlls and tht' prt'chion of the result... <br />For the rtc"plicate analyses Within the same meth(x1 using <br />the same "3turating nwdium, thl" differl.'nce:< in re'iults of <br />anal~'ZmR the ~;lme ~amplt.s are within an order of magni- <br />tude, However, the differem.'(:'s in thl' rl.'~ult:< from different <br />method... using differing s:ltur;\tin~ media are very signifi- <br />C:lnt, rangmg I"lt:twel'n one :lnu five order< of rna!o(nitll{k, <br />rbrkrnann anu Edington L:!OOll attrihuted the difk'fence <br />hetwt:en the results from the difft:rt'nt meth(xh to change~ <br />in the day StruLturl' m [he ...;ampltc"s that prohahly occurred <br />during prepar-.!Iion of tbe ...amples for 3nalysi.. with air. Tht: <br />clay.. in thl.' <;amples presum;lhly remainL-u in a maximum <br />state of swdling a~ long as the sampll.'s remained hydrated: <br />however. those same clay... may have under~unl' shrink:lgl' <br />and/or cracking upon drying for rhe te<;ts u..in,l.: air. llw <br />o,;en.~itl\'i{y ;Inaly"t's dearly indicate thaI tn;llntaining clay <br />struC1ure in ;1:- near a naturalsl.lIe a." pos:<ible i:-. ah....olutely <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />IKO <br />