Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\"umCAl llJDR.ilUCCU\Dlcmm_lft,.ulRJ-_\fJ-:\TI L\ mE DE.\lF.l?B....\/x COlOJUOO <br /> <br />of fine-grained sedimenb and the o\er.lll geometry of flu- <br />vial dunnd-depositeu, coar~-gr;llned. water-be;lrin~ inter- <br />val.. interlaced with (jne-grained Q\'er-hank _"t'dimenl" <br />Fine-grained sediment.. tend (0 dominale the ...edI01(mtary <br />sequence; particularly within the Denyer aquifer. wherl' <br />the net satur.lIed s.lnd thicknt'Ss is ;It mo:-.I 35% of the total <br />thickness of Ihe unit interval (Roh"Do. 198-). As pointetl <br />OUI above, thi... ...hale-dominaoct' innl':bl.'''' 10 Iht" t"3st. <br />away from the sediment source area_ <br />;-':ot only do fine-gr.lint:d :-.edinwnb It'nd to dominat<: <br />the Basin. hut abo the- lenticul:lr tlu\-ial channd sand lxxl- <br />ks are interpreted to he se-parated by sh;lle. and therdore <br />art.' bdievrtl to I~ fXXlrly inll'rt'onneCled hydraulically <br />(:-;'ielsen. 2001 j, Figure .3 shows gt;.'ophysical logs from a <br />pair of production wdb in nonhero Douglas County Ihal <br />includt' nearly all of the Dell\t'r aquifer and tht;' t.'ntire Ara- <br />paho!;.' aquifer. Shale dearly dominate,> lh... im...ryal covt:re-d <br />hy Ihese 1\\'0 lo,lo:s. Funhermore. many of the watcr-he-arinj.!: <br />sand..tone byt'fS vary considerahly in thicknes.s e\'l'n <br />though these wells are within 100 ft of each otht'f. 111e <br />limited lateral extent of the waler-tx--aring sandstone byer:-. <br />trapped within rdati\'ely impermeahle Sh;llL' that is most <br />evident in the D/;'nver aquif/;'r portion of lbt' logs: this <br />gt:ometry sll~ests limited hydraulic iOH:rconnt"Clion <br />throughoUl this interval. <br /> <br />GROU1\TIWATER flOW IN 11-IE DENVER DASI:'oO <br />AQUIFER SYSTF~\f <br /> <br />Groundwafer flow in thl..' DenV/;'r Il;lsin aquifer system <br />is complex. j.!:ivt'n the vastness of the aquift'rs and the <br />complexity of the s/;'dinwmary packaj.!:e. The uSGS has <br />developt..>u a concept of tht' flow system (Rohson, 19R7) <br />that, hy necessity, is relatively _~imple in ordn fo form a <br />foundation for descrihing Iht' dyn;lmics of tht' r!;.'source <br />and to prt'dict how tht' resource will rl'spond to de\"e1np- <br />mt'nt Tht' conl:t'ptual modd also (onform.s to the lay/;'rt'd <br />:lquifer syslem fixed hy statult,'. In Ihis conceptual m(xld. <br />ground\vater recharges an individual aquift:r by infiltration <br />of precipit:lIion and/or vertic;ll flow from anotht:r aquifer. <br />Groundwater disdlargl~.~ from the aquifer by: I) outllow to <br />connl'Cted surfact' wall'r: 2) flow to an IIndt'rlyin~ :lquifer; <br />or .3) hy pumpin~. <br />Unfortunately. tht:R' are few empirical d;lta th;Jt can lx, <br />1lst.'<I to descritx- WOllndwater l10w conditions in the <br />aquift'r syslem prior to development however. 1111..' L:-GS <br />has used 1978 a.s a timt... :-.t:Jning point when devt'1opment <br />was rdali\'t'1y minor gi\Tn the v3slne-:-..s of the resource. <br />Groundwater flow in the four prinnpal aquifers using the <br />1978 benchmark \vas helit'\-ed to haw bet'n gt:nt'rally out- <br />ward from the southern pan. of the Basin in the- vicinity of <br />tht' Palmer divide topographic high /Fijot_ I). TI1t" majorllY <br /> <br />eue.r <br />e ~e <br />~~ . <br />'00. <br /> <br />"'" <br />ern <br /> <br />wtUS919H <br /> <br />WtlJ, 4lW-r <br /> <br />~--- - <br /> <br />J.. <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />~>- <br /> <br />II==?- _ <br /> <br />~.= = <br />- .=-0=............ <br /> <br />.. '-, <br /> J~ <br />... <br />""- <br />.l.a..... <br />.. <br />~OI' <:l <br />.~... <br />...~ <br />. 0'" <br /> - <br />,. <br /> <br />- ~~ <br />- -:;,.- - =- <br />lOO' - <br /> x- - <br />- ~ <br />=- - <br /> <br />;:=- <br /> <br />- <br />~~ <br /> <br />- -> ~ = <br />.... :=.~. . <br /> <br />~C':;. <br /> <br />- ~~. <br /> <br />~'" <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />:> <br /> <br />-sol <br /> <br />-"- <br /> <br />- ".-- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />I li> <br /> <br />~ <br />=- -1-"'--= <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br />-- ~ -1;- <br /> <br />'''' <br /> <br />j~--=- <br />~~- <br /> <br />-,., <br /> <br />- <br />-~ <br /> <br />= "'= <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />='-'-'/"=--= - <br /> <br />-~ <br />",-"""""",,- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... <br />t <br /> <br />Figure 3. Re5islivit)' logs irom two production wdter we!fs less <br />lhdn 100ft apart in T6S, R68W in Doug!a~ County show thl;.' greal <br />lateral variability in thickness oi many 01 the individual waler- <br />bearing sand~tone layer~_ The dominance of ~hare within the <br />~quen(e is dearlv ('viden! In the Denver dquifer. Provided by <br />Glenn Graham, Colorado Division Oi\Volter ~eo;ources. <br /> <br />of no\\' \\':I.~ dirl:"cktJ north toward thl..' 'south platte- Rj\-l'r <br />(Rohson. lW~-). :\ w-;lter Imdj.tl;'l fIll" the prinCipal aqlllfer> <br /> <br />17j <br /> <br />TIll.' !(ocky .\!mml..;n ....',,,, "Hum of (i~'(~O~N~ <br />