My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00004
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:03:32 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Land and Water Fund
Description
Gunnison Basin Water: No Panacea for the Front Range
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Meeting Water Demand Without Gunnison Water <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Potable reuse refers to the physical treatment of wastewater to drinking water <br />standards and re-circulating it through the regular distribution system. This can be <br />accomplished by treating the effluent and directly releasing it into the distribution <br />system or by blending treated effluent with raw water, then treating this mixture to <br />meet drinking water standards. <br /> <br />Substitution arrangements-taking the form of exchanges, plans of augmenta- <br />tion, first-use agreements, and water trades-allow for the delivery of effluent to <br />downstream water users in exchange for Denver's use of upstream water. For exam- <br />ple, a downstream farmer may not mind that the water he diverts is below drinking <br />water standards. He might be willing to exchange a more permanent supply of return <br />flows from a city's water system for rights he has to water stored in a pristine head- <br />waters area (water that would require less treatment by the city). Both parties must <br />agree to the quantity and quality of the exchanged water and must, in order to com- <br />ply with Colorado law, keep stream flows between the points of exchange at sufficient <br />levels to protect intervening water users. <br /> <br />Technical and political feasibility of large-scale potable reuse have been <br />demonstrated or are planned in other parts of the country. A plant in Fairfax County, <br />Virginia, has re-purified water for human consumption since 1978, without health <br />problems. The San Diego County Water Authority proposes to construct a 20 million <br />gallon/day water re-purification facility.''''' The town of Cary, North Carolina has <br />invested $10 million in a reclaimed water system to supply irrigation water to its resi- <br />dential and commercial customers.'" Notably, conventionally treated wastewater <br />from upstream cities makes up a good portion of the stream flow from which most <br />Denver providers currently draw supplies. '" <br /> <br />Large-scale effluent re-use as a Front Range water supply strategy is not with- <br />out its own challenges, including public acceptability and potential impacts on down- <br />stream water users. However, the enormous potential of re-use to help meet demand <br />at costs and with impacts that are less than those of a Gunnison Basin import suggest <br />that it must be part of a any sound Front Range water supply strategy. <br /> <br />b. Conjunctive use <br /> <br />Conjunctive use means the coordinated use of ground and surface water <br />resources. In a nutshell, in "wet" and average years, surface supplies would be <br />tapped to the fullest extent possible, even storing some extra water in groundwater <br />aquifers that would then be available for drought years. Denver's southern suburbs, <br />some of which already rely heavily on groundwater,'" are some of the best candidates <br />for conjunctive use. <br /> <br />The Denver Basin aquifer system, although not a source of supply that will <br />last forever, is likely to provide a significant portion of southern suburbs' water sup- <br />ply for many centuries. The Denver Basin Aquifers contain approximately 300 mil- <br />lion AF of drainable water storage.'" This volume of water amounts to a reservoir 15 <br />times greater than the active storage of Lake Powell (20 million AF), and 400 times <br />greater than the active storage of Colorado's Blue Mesa Reservoir (750,000 AF). <br /> <br />Gunnison Basin Water <br /> <br />.43. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.