Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The Gunnison: A Basin In Balance <br /> <br />CD <br /> <br />mostly in the summer months. Curecanti National Recreation Area, which surrounds <br />Blue Mesa, was created through a Memorandum of Agreement between the Secretary <br />of the Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation in 1965." It relies on the expansive <br />water rights of the Aspinall Unit (including Blue Mesa's second fill) to fulfill its pur- <br />poses. Taylor Park Reservoir also hosts thousands of visitors each year and relies on <br />the significant quantities of water secured to it under decrees and agreements. <br /> <br />(3) Recreational and Environmental Uses Below Asoinall <br /> <br />The Secretary of the Interior and Bureau of Reclamation have the authority <br />and obligation, under several federal statutes, to operate the Aspinall Unit for the <br />benefit of fish and wildlife below the Aspinall Unit. Section 8 of CRSPA, the Act <br />authorizing the construction of the Aspinall Unit, directed the Secretary of the <br />Interior to operate and maintain CRSPA facilities to mitigate the loss of and improve <br />conditions for fish and wildlife and to provide recreational facilities." In 1968, the <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act established recreation and fish and wildlife uses as <br />primary purposes of all CRSPA reservoirs, including the Aspinall Unit." In addition, <br />the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires that federal agencies consult with the <br />Fish & Wildlife Service and local fisheries agencies to improve wildlife resources and <br />give those resource "equal consideration" with other features of water development <br />projects. " <br /> <br />In addition to these federal authorities, there are distinct quantities of water <br />that already have been dedicated to preserve the river environment in the lower <br />Gunnison. Below are brief descriptions of three environmental flows already in exis- <br />tence: (a) mitigation flows for the Dolores and Dallas Creek projects; (b) a minimum <br />instream flow for Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park; and (c) bypass flows <br />at the Redlands diversion dam for the benefit of federally endangered fish. <br /> <br />(a) Mitigation flows for Dolores and Dallas Creek Projects <br /> <br />The Dolores and Dallas Creek Projects are storage and diversion facilities in <br />southwestern Colorado that create water release obligations from the Aspinall Unit. <br />The Dolores Project, located in the Dolores and San Juan River Basins, utilizes water <br />that would otherwise contribute to the flow of the Colorado River, just across the <br />state line in Utah. This project is comprised of McPhee Reservoir, formed by McPhee <br />Dam and Great Cut Dike, and the Dawson Draw Reservoir, which was constructed <br />specifically for fish and wildlife enhancement and is supplied primarily from irriga- <br />tion return flows. When first proposed for construction, the Dolores Project was <br />expected to deplete an average of 131,000 AFA. The Dallas Creek Project, named for <br />its location along Dallas Creek, a tributary of the Uncompahgre River, is comprised of <br />Ridgeway Dam and Reservoir. When this Project was conceived, it was expected to <br />result in additional annual depletions of 17,000 AFA. <br /> <br />In the 1979 and 1980 Biological Opinions on these proposed projects, the FWS <br />concluded that the cumulative effects of this proposed depletion of 148,000 AFA, <br />along with the cumulative impact from related CRSPA projects, "is likely to jeopard- <br />ize the continued existence of the Colorado squawfish [now called the pike minnow], <br /> <br />Gunnison Basin Water <br /> <br />. 11 . <br />