My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00001
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:57:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1992
Title
Transmountain Diversions in 1992 and Arapahoe County Transmountain Litigation of Gunnison River Water
Author
Hillhouse/Hultin/Spaanstra, P.C.
Description
Presentation addressing considerations applicable to a proposed substantial transmountin diversion project and issues about the Gunnison River litigation
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />79. The use of the active storage capacity of Taylor Park <br />Reservoir, in conjunction with the Aspinall Unit, has been <br />essential in order to achieve the benefits listed in Paragraphs 74 <br />and 75 above. The stabilization of flows under the 1975 Agreement <br />has benefitted the following: <br /> <br />a. downstream irricrators by reason of easier headgate <br />management and higher river flows; . <br />b. fisheries, in that the spawn and fry life stages are not <br />disrupted by changes in flow and flows are established within <br />an optimum range for all life stages; <br />c. landowners, by virtue of the reduction in the frequency <br />and severity of flooding; and <br />d. recreational users, in that river flows are more <br />predictable, and useable boating flows occur more frequently. <br /> <br />80. The 1975 Agreement has resulted in legal benefit to third <br />party owners of irrigation water rights between Taylor Park <br />Reservoir and Blue Mesa Reservoir. Prior to the 1975 Agreement, <br />those irrigation water rights could not lawfully divert water <br />released from Taylor Park Reservoir since they were subject to <br />curtailment by the Division Engineer. The operations under the <br />1975 Agreement have made water legally available to irrigation <br />users which would not have been available in the absence of the <br />1975 Agreement. <br /> <br />4. Exchange Accounting: <br /> <br />81. After the execution of the 1975 Agreement, the United <br />States (through the Bureau of Reclamation) has accounted for the <br />exchange between Taylor Park Reservoir and the Aspinall Unit by <br />means of a formula which gives credit to the UVWUA account in the <br />Aspinall Unit for all water in excess of 20 c. f. s. which is <br />measured at the U.S.G.S. stream gauge below Taylor Park Dam. The <br />parties to the 1975 Agreement intended, and the Court finds, that <br />the water in the UVWUA account in the Aspinall Unit was stored <br />under the 1904 priority of the Taylor Park Reservoir water right. <br /> <br />a. The 20 c. f . s. exception to credits is based upon an <br />assumption by the Bureau that 20 c.f.s is the minimum bypass <br />of inflows into the Reservoir which is necessary to maintain <br />at least some live flow in the river below the dam. This <br />figure bears a reasonable relationship to the minimum river <br />flows which were historically bypassed from storage by the <br />UVWUA orior to the 1975 Agreement. The Bureau has determined <br />to credit UVWUA for all measured flows in excess of this <br />minimum bypass because this is water which is either released <br />from storage or could have been stored in Taylor Park Reser- <br />voir'in priority, but was not stored for the benefit of UVWUA <br />until it reached the Aspinall Unit. The Court finds that this <br />procedure facilitates the implementation of said Agreement <br />which requires certain flows to maintain the beneficial uses <br />for fishery and recreation described in the Agreement. [This <br />procedure is also consistent with the provisions of 537-87- <br />102(4), C.R.S. 15 (1990)] <br /> <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.