Laserfiche WebLink
<br />eral suggestions were made to the Committee on ways in which <br />the existing statute might be strengthened. Among these were <br />that the Committee follow the so-called "model law. for reg- <br />ulation of weather modification activities. This law is <br />recommended by the membership of the Weather Modification <br />Association. Another suggestion was that the committee adopt <br />the so-called Texas system which places the control of weath- <br />er modification within that state's Water Development Board. <br />A third recommendation was that the Committee consider estab- <br />lishing a special board to coordinate and regulate the activ- <br />ities of weather modifiers within this state. In summary, <br />most of the suggestions would place the responsibility in the <br />hands of a specific board instead of placing it singularly <br />within the control of the Director of the Department of Nat- <br />ural Resources. <br /> <br />The Committee wishes to point out that the original <br />Weather Control statute -- Chapter 295, Session Laws of Colo- <br />rado 1951 (House Bill 251, 1951 session) -- created a "Weath- <br />er Control Commission" composed of five members appointed by <br />the Governor. One member was appointed from each of the four <br />congressional districts and one member was appointed at large <br />for five year overlapping terms (one new member was appointed <br />each year). This provision was repealed by Chapter 94, Ses- <br />sio~ iaws of Colorado 1962, and the responsibility for the <br />.:<:eg'J:lutL:m of weathe:r Modification programs was placed in the <br />offi.;;,@ Q,f the Directm: of the Oepart.ment of Natural ResDu:rcos. <br /> <br />Committee Conclusions <br /> <br />Administration. The Committee considered reestablish- <br />ing a control board, or placing the responsibility in the <br />hands of the state Water Conservation Board, but, recognizing <br />that the policy of the Committee on Reorganization of State <br />Government is to discourage the tendency to add new boards, <br />it rejected that approach. In fact, it was pointed out that <br />it was the desire of th9 Committee on Reorganization of State <br />Government to simplify the structure of state government that <br />led to the abolishment of the aforementioned Weather Control <br />Commission. The 1961 Legislative Council Report on Simplifi- <br />cation of State Government (Research Publication No. 55, De- <br />cember, 1961) stated: <br /> <br />