My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Boulder 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Boulder 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2011 3:31:58 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
Boulder Water Conservation Plan
Title
1996 Water Conservation Plan
Date
5/30/1996
County
Boulder
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7-16 <br /> <br />The survey also yielded information about water conservation awareness. Only 13 <br />percent of respondents were aware of the City's ongoing conservation program, and only 23 <br />percent were aware of the block rate billing system. The older residents (41 and over) were <br />more familiar with the City's programs. The survey helped show what influences Boulder <br />residents to conserve. For example, the billing structure didn't appear as a major motivator <br />since only 5 pcrcent of the respondents said they were influenced by the block rates. The <br />same was true for exterior water conservation measures. <br /> <br />Water UtiIily. The survey solicited opinions on the water utility and its operations. <br />Seventy pcrcent of the respondents rated the water utility positively, and 82 percent felt that <br />the water rates were "just about right" Forty pcrcent opted for a 0 to 10 percent increase <br />in their water bill to improve system reliability, and 22 percent would pay for an 11 to 20 <br />percent increase. <br /> <br />7.2.5 InitiaJ Saeening of Water Conservation Measures <br /> <br />There are many water conservation devices and measures. Some of these are worth <br />evaluating in detail and others are obviously impractical. An initial screening was conducted <br />to e1iminate the impractical measures so as to focus on the remaining viable measures. An <br />initial list of 70 conservation measures is contained in Table 7.3. <br /> <br />Table 7-3 Prelimin.ITY Water Co1\V!ITcltion Measures List <br /> <br />Measure <br /> <br />Description, <br /> <br />Inu:rior Jl..m-Iial Walei' CoIIsc:naIioIl W6~ _a <br /> <br />Current plumbing CXlde <br />Advanced plumbing CXlde <br />Showerhead )lIOmotion <br />Multiple family water consultation <br /> <br />Retrofit devices (depot/l-year program) <br /> <br />Suiaer aiteria for current CXlde <br /> <br />More severe CXlde (e.g. 1.6 gpf toilet) <br /> <br />Promotion and store rebates <br /> <br />Water conservation information and <br />gM-aways <br /> <br />Water conservation information and <br />gM-aways <br /> <br />Aa:clerated program. low-flow kits <br />given at pre-cstablished locations <br /> <br />Low-flow kits given at pre-established <br />locations . <br /> <br />Customer must man-away for low-flow <br />kits <br /> <br />Single family water consultation <br /> <br />Retrofit devices (depot pickup) <br /> <br />Reuofit devices (maiI-out) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.