My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Weather Mod Critical Issues Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Weather Mod Critical Issues Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2011 10:18:23 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:03:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Project Name
Weather Modification
Title
Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research
Date
1/1/2004
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.4 Cloud modeling of cloud seeding effects <br /> <br />This has been a continuing effort conducted by a few cloud modeling groups over <br />the past thirty years. Simulations of many types of cloud seeding experiments have been <br />accomplished. Much of the work depended on simplifications of the microphysics and of <br />the dynamics, but even so basic effects were evident that will likely stand the test of more <br />sophisticated treatments suggested in the NRC report, Some of the findings are listed <br />below, <br /> <br />The NRC report failed to critically review the development of cloud models over <br />the past 20 to 30 years, with respect to cloud seeding simulations, and with respect to <br />natural cloud precipitation simulations. No NRC committee member was particularly <br />active in the modeling field, except in the dynamics of clouds. The report concentrated <br />on the future use of complex microphysical and three-dimensional, time-dependent <br />research cloud models that in general are of little use in operations now. They failed to <br />evaluate what has been developed and what could be applied with current computer <br />power and model capabilities on operational projects. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Bulk-water microphysical techniques were used in most of the cloud models in <br />the early days and are currently being used in large-scale weather prediction models. <br />This process, assumes zero terminal velocity for the cloud water and cloud ice, relatively <br />small terminal velocities for snow content, modest values for rain, and the largest vertical <br />velocities for graupel and hail. The velocities vary with the quantity of precipitation <br />content at a grid point. Such a framework allows for the production of rain from cloud <br />water, the formation of cloud ice at appropriate observed temperatures, the production of <br />snow from supercooled water and cloud ice or the depositional growth of cloud ice, and <br />the production of graupel/hail from frozen rain (via probabilistic freezing) or interactions <br />between the liquid and ice contents. If rain does not form from cloud liquid (as is the <br />case in many higher latitude clouds) then it forms later in the lifetime of the cloud <br />through melting of ice particles, The growth ofthe graupel/hail considers both wet and <br />dry growth processes, Nearly thirty interactive processes among the various water <br />processes (such as accretion, collection, aggregation, etc.) are simulated. The paper by <br />Lin et al. (1983) describes the early development that is the basis for many of the models. <br /> <br />It has become more common in recent years for bulk microphysics schemes to <br />predict two moments such as hydro meteor mixing ratio and concentration (Ferrier et aI., <br />1995; Meyers et aI., 1997; Reisner et aI., 1998). A somewhat different paradigm is to <br />emulate an explicit bin model by prescribing basis functions for the drop size <br />distributions such as gamma or log-normal distributions (Clark, 1976; Clark and Hall, <br />1983) and explicitly predict the evolution ofthose basis functions by vapor <br />deposition/evaporation, stochastic coalescence, and sedimentation. Tzivion et al. (1994) <br />predict three parameters that fully define the basis functions: mixing ratio, number <br />concentration, and a third moment. Milbrandt and Yau (2004) have implemented such a <br />model for application to hailstorm simulations, This model does a much better job of <br />representing hail processes than the earlier bulk-water microphysical methods without the <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.