Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the ranges that feed the upper Green River above Flaming Gorge Reservoir, <br />we involve the Wyoming Range and the Snake River, the Gros Ventre and Wind <br />River ranges and several tributaries of the Yellowstone River, and the <br />Uinta Range and the Duchesne River. Likewise if we consider the Colorado <br />River above Grand Junction, we must deal with the Front Range and the <br />North Platte River, the Sawatch Range and the Arkansas River, the La Garrita <br />Mountains and the Rio Grande, and rhe San Juan Mountains and the San <br />Juan River. Do we consider the San Juan River: we have only the San Juan <br />Mountains as a major range, and affect also the Rio Grande. <br /> <br />These geographical facts place Colorado at the hub of its.local water <br />universe and connects its weather modification policy and future program <br />with those of each and all of its neighboring states and with the Lower <br />Basin states of Nevada, Arizona, and California. In each river, and <br />in each state, there is or soon will be greater demand for Colorado State <br />water than can be met from the present flow of the rivers. <br /> <br />d <br />. <br /> <br />Is Colorado River Basin water to be dedicated to production of shale oil? <br />To gasification, liquification, or slurry transport of coal? To cooling <br />of fossil- or nuclear-fueled power plants? These uses cannot but reduce <br />the amount dedicated to the lowest-priority use, irrigated agriculture. <br />Perhaps by limiting further expansion of irrigation. Perhaps even by <br />withdrawing presently irrigated land from production, especially in <br />times of water famine. Can the State of Colorado afford to stand aside <br />from any issue germane to this situation? By putting more water in the <br />river, Colorado would improve its situation. By putting forth its <br />best effort, regardless of the degree of success, it would strengthen <br />its hand. <br /> <br />Colorado has a stake. It has also an unique opportunity. Many of the <br />barriers tending to delay application of weather modification are easier <br />for the State to surmount than for either the Federal Government or local <br />groups. The workshop group on socioeconomics at the Skywater IX <br />conference a year ago identified the following barriers: <br /> <br />Heterogeneity of needs and concerns among potential users <br />Lack of an adequate water-pricing mechanism to determine who pays for <br />what <br />Lack of demonstrated capability or a scientific consensus supporting <br />validity <br />Lack of sensitivity toward people <br />Lack of a mechanism for compensating the disbenefitted <br />No one level of government appropriately situated to take action <br /> <br />They went on to note that the role of government is to respond to the interests <br />and concerns of citizens and to balance needs against constraints. Colorado <br />and Coloradans have a stake: Colorado can respond to interests of Coloradans <br />and balance their needs against the constraints. <br /> <br />Another factor is the policy <br />no consistent local policy. <br /> <br />vacuum. There is no national policy. There is <br />Colorado, In coordination with other Colorado <br /> <br />ry <br />