My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 3:47:47 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Applicant
Colorado State University Cooperative Extensions
Project Name
Improvement of Irrigation Technology in Arkansas River Valley
Title
Demonstrations of Irrigation Technology to Improve Crop Yields, Returns and Water Quality in the Arkansas River Valley of Colorado Summary and Conclusions
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Applic
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
ArkValley Irrigation Grant SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />Demonstration of Irrigation Technology <br />to Improve Crop Yields, Returns and Water Quality in the <br />Arkansas River Valley of Colorado <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The Arkansas River in southeast Colorado is one of the most saline rivers in the United States. The <br />average salinity levels of the canal systems along the river increase from 300 ppm total dissolved solids <br />(TDS) near Pueblo to over 4,000 ppm near the Colorado-Kansas border. As a result, salinity levels on <br />cropland being irrigated with these waters are higher than desirable. Crop yields on several thousand <br />acres are being reduced as a result of these high salinity levels. <br /> <br />Two basic processes responsible for the high salinity levels are salt pickup and salt concentration. Salt <br />pickup occurs from water flowing over saline and sedimentary materials, from erosion of saline soils, <br />from deep percolation through saline soils and from groundwater flow through saline sedimentary <br />deposits. Irrigated agriculture causes salt pickup by water flowing over and percolating through salty <br />soils. <br /> <br />Salt concentration is significantly increased by consumptive use due to human activities. "Consumptive <br />use alone causes a seven-fold increase in the salt concentration in the Arkansas River." (Ref. #2) <br />Evapotranspiration by crops and from weeds and phreatophytes in waste water areas are important <br />consumptive uses as well as evaporation from reservoirs, canals, high water table areas and from <br />cropland receiving excessive amounts of irrigation water or poorly timed irrigations. Municipal and <br />industrial activities also contribute to the consumptive use ofthese waters. <br /> <br />An additional problem is nitrates from highly fertilized crops are being carried to the Arkansas River as <br />tailwater return flow as well as through the root zone by deep percolation. This is the result of over- <br />irrigation due to inefficient methods of water application. <br /> <br />New irrigation conservation technology as low energy precision application (LEPA) through center pivot <br />systems with drop hoses and Low Drift Nozzles was used in the demonstration to improve irrigation <br />effectiveness and reduce labor. Surge irrigation with the use of computerized, solar powered valves was <br />successfully demonstrated in 1996 but was abandoned in 1997 due to continuing pump and labor <br />problems. Sorghum-sudangrass being surge irrigated produced equal yields of 6 tons per acre but used <br />up to 25% less water as compared to conventional irrigation. <br /> <br />Initial soil tests indicated an extremely high salt content on both of the fields being used on this project. <br />Analysis of composite soil samples from each of the two fields used in the demonstration showed soil <br />electrical conductivity (EC), a measure of salts, at the surface foot in Pivot #7 averaged 5.2 mmhoslcm <br />while EC ranged from 4.7 mmhos/cm on the Apishapa silt clay to 6.9 mmhos/cm on the Bloom silt loam <br />in Pivot #8. Sub soil samples in Pivot #7 ranged from a low of6.1 at the 10 foot level to a high of8.8 <br />mmhos/cm at the 3 foot level. EC on the Bloom silt loam was 13.6 mmhos/cm at the 2 foot level while <br />staying in the 7.3 or less in the Apishapa silty loam. <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.