Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />Demonstration of Irrigation Technology <br />to Improve Crop Yields, Returns and Water Quality in the <br />Arkansas River Valley of Colorado <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The Arkansas River in southeast Colorado is one of the most saline rivers in the United States. The <br />average salinity levels of the canal systems along the river increase from 300 ppm total dissolved solids <br />(TDS) near Pueblo to over 4,000 ppm near the Colorado-Kansas border. As a result, salinity levels on <br />cropland being irrigated with these waters are higher than desirable. Crop yields on several thousand <br />acres are being reduced as a result of these high salinity levels. <br /> <br />Two basic processes responsible for the high salinity levels are salt pickup and salt concentration. Salt <br />pickup occurs from water flowing over saline and sedimentary materials, from erosion of saline soils, <br />from deep percolation through saline soils and from groundwater flow through saline sedimentary <br />deposits. Irrigated agriculture causes salt pickup by water flowing over and percolating through salty <br />soils. <br /> <br />Salt concentration is significantly increased by consumptive use due to human activities. "Consumptive <br />use alone causes a seven-fold increase in the salt concentration in the Arkansas River." (Ref. #2) <br />Evapotranspiration by crops and from weeds and phreatophytes in waste water areas are important <br />consumptive uses as well as evaporation from reservoirs, canals, high water table areas and from <br />cropland receiving excessive amounts of irrigation water or poorly timed irrigations. Municipal and <br />industrial activities also contribute to the consumptive use ofthese waters. <br /> <br />An additional problem is nitrates from highly fertilized crops are being carried to the Arkansas River as <br />tailwater return flow as well as through the root zone by deep percolation. This is the result of over- <br />irrigation due to inefficient methods of water application. <br /> <br />New irrigation conservation technology as low energy precision application (LEPA) through center pivot <br />systems with drop hoses and Low Drift Nozzles was used in the demonstration to improve irrigation <br />effectiveness and reduce labor. Surge irrigation with the use of computerized, solar powered valves was <br />successfully demonstrated in 1996 but was abandoned in 1997 due to continuing pump and labor <br />problems. Sorghum-sudangrass being surge irrigated produced equal yields of 6 tons per acre but used <br />up to 25% less water as compared to conventional irrigation. <br /> <br />Initial soil tests indicated an extremely high salt content on both of the fields being used on this project. <br />Analysis of composite soil samples from each of the two fields used in the demonstration showed soil <br />electrical conductivity (EC), a measure of salts, at the surface foot in Pivot #7 averaged 5.2 mmhoslcm <br />while EC ranged from 4.7 mmhos/cm on the Apishapa silt clay to 6.9 mmhos/cm on the Bloom silt loam <br />in Pivot #8. Sub soil samples in Pivot #7 ranged from a low of6.1 at the 10 foot level to a high of8.8 <br />mmhos/cm at the 3 foot level. EC on the Bloom silt loam was 13.6 mmhos/cm at the 2 foot level while <br />staying in the 7.3 or less in the Apishapa silty loam. <br /> <br />I <br />