My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Loveland 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Loveland 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2011 12:15:28 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Loveland Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
5/1/1996
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 27. Measures on the short list not selected for the plan <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />',:'}'tk,~'0~t?', ~liorf~~ted{jjj~~s~res <\~~;t~,trr~'itt\ .,'- Y~r;~11r[~~;,~;_::;;jI*i~s-o\~!q~~!~~~!~~~~gS~!~I;~1:~-~-~ <br /> Although the licensing of contractors is an <br />Require sprinkIer contractors to be certified excellent idea, to include it in this plan as a I <br />and licensed by the City. conservation measure did not seem <br /> I <br /> appropriate. <br /> Public acceptance was seen as being low, <br /> especially if the remodel was minor. It could <br />Require installation of low- flow encourage people to not get Building <br />showerheads, toilets and low-flow faucet Permits. The cost of a ultra-low volume toilet <br />aerators at time of Building Permit for may be a hardship for some. Also, it did not <br />remodeling. seem environmentally responsible to replace <br /> working toilets, without having a recycling <br /> program for them. <br /> This would be very time-consuming and <br />Offer landscape water-use audits to therefore expensive. It would be better to <br />residential and commercial customers. include this with public information and <br /> provide a self-audit for customers. <br /> This would be very time-consuming and <br />Provide a service for landscape plan design therefore expensive. With the amount of <br />development occurring in Loveland, it would <br />review. take a lot of time to review all plans at <br /> development review. <br />~ - School yards are already used as public use <br />Use school yards as parks for public use. areas. This would not decrease the amount of <br /> area to be irrigated. <br /> This is not illegal in Colorado, but it was <br />Develop code amendments permitting use of deemed that the public is not ready for using <br />greywater from bathtubs, showers and greywater. This is a measure we will be <br />bathroom and kitchen sinks for irrigation. monitoring and may be re-evaluated in the <br /> future. <br /> As of January I, 1994, federal law requires <br />Offer rebates for replacing existing toilets that all toilets manufactured in the U.S, be <br />with 1.6 gallons/flush (gpf) toilets. 1.6 gallons per flush or less. When replacing <br /> a toilet, only 1.6 gpfmodels are available. <br /> This would be very time-consuming and <br />Offer commercial and residential leak therefore a costly measure. There are other <br />detection programs. measures that would be more effective, both <br /> in terms of water savings and budget. <br /> <br />May 1996 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Water Conservation Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.