My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NCWCD Ag Options Program Applic
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
NCWCD Ag Options Program Applic
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:06:56 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Contract/PO #
C153674
Applicant
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Project Name
Agricultural Options Program
Title
Grant Application
Date
6/30/1993
County
Larimer
Weld
Boulder
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Application
Document Relationships
CBT/WG Water Sharing Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Award Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Contract
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Prog Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Workplan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Water Conservation Grant Application - Part 3 <br /> <br />1. Project description: <br /> <br />a) Introduction <br /> <br />There Is Increasing recognition of the importance of cooperation between the <br />aglicultural and municipal sectors to attain the most efficient use of Colorado's scarce water <br />resources. One way in which such cooperation can be achieved Is through the use of <br />arrangements, often called "dry-year options," under which municipalities can call on water <br />from the aglicultural community in shortage conditions. <br /> <br />Hlstolically, municipalities needing additional water supply sources have purchased <br />aglicultural lights outright. Although the cities typically do not expect to use the additional <br />water for many years, the need to secure dependable supply has forced them to spend large <br />sums of money to buy and maintain the lights until the water Is actually required. <br />Agricultural areas have been taken out of production, with concomitant disruption to the local <br />economy and environment. <br /> <br />Dry-year options offer a way to preserve the state's important agricultural sector while <br />meeting urban water needs. They also enable cities to ensure adequate water supply at a <br />lower cost than through purchasing water lights. Dry-year options result in the efficient <br />allocation and use of scarce water resources. <br /> <br />b) The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District agricultural options program <br /> <br />The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. which operates the Colorado-Big <br />Thompson (C-BT) Project and (through its Municipal Subdistrict) the Windy Gap Project. is <br />developing a program for aglicultural-munlcipal water sharing through the use of option <br />contracts. The C-BT Project was designed and built by the federal Bureau of Reclamation as a <br />supplemental source of water supply for agricultural and municipal use In northern Colorado. <br />The project's service area includes Boulder. La1imer. Logan. Morgan, Sedgwick and Weld <br />Counties. <br /> <br />In the 1970s. the Municipal Subdistrict was formed to develop the Windy Gap Project. <br />an additional water supply for the participating municipalities. Six cites -- Boulder. <br />Broomfield, Estes Park, Greeley. Longmont and Loveland -- currentiy participate in the <br />Subdistrict. <br /> <br />Like many Colorado cities. the Subdistrict members are concerned about seculing <br />adequate water for their growing populations. The District's aglicultural options program <br />would help assure municipal supply in dry peliods through the use of option contracts with <br />holders of C-BT allotments. When the options were exercised. the fanners would forego use of <br />their C-BT water for that year. with the water instead being delivered to the municipalities <br />through the Windy Gap Project. <br /> <br />The Subdistrict entered into a Carriage Contract in 1990 with the District and the <br />United States to carry Windy Gap water and also to allow the Subdistrict to borrow water from <br />the C-BT Project. As an integral part of this Carriage Contract, the Subdistrict was required to <br />develop a basic operating clitelia to protect the C-BT water users from injury due to the <br /> <br />(WFS]ENGINEE:RING <br />SCOIT <br />.474 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.