Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1.3 . Resolution #5, Series of 1993 <br />Following its review and rejection of the proposed 1990 Water Management Plan, for reasons <br />described earlier, City Council initiated a resolution to define a City policy for comprehensive water <br />management particularly focusing on the question of the conditions under which the City should <br />expand potable water service outside of the present City limits. The resolution provides a policy, <br />framework for evaluating potential service expansions, water development projects, and conservation <br />measures as a strategy to expand the availability of silpply. One of the primary policy goals is <br />maintenance of in-stream flows to protect aquatic life and aesthetic and recreational values of area <br />streams. Resolution #5 is included as Attachment A. <br /> <br />1.4 Water Audit (1994) <br />Following adoption of the water policy framework contained in Resolution #5, the City initiated a <br />program to measure the effectiveness of its current system of potable water delivery and metering. <br />A preliminary evaluation of the water system's efficiency indicated that when comparing records of <br />metered water sales and potable water production in 1993, approximately 45% of annual average <br />deliveries could be accounted for under metered water sales, representing 55% unaccounted-for <br />water. This is despite mandatory metering requirements for potable water use. A 1989 Water <br />Department estimate of water loss placed this figure at 15%. <br /> <br />The Water Department authorized a comprehensive water audit program in 1994 to investigate the <br />sources and causes of what appeared to be an inadequate distribution and metering system. The <br />objective of the program was to reduce the unaccounted-for water production to 10-15%, a figure. <br />representative of water industry standards, over a five-year period. The 1994 water audit <br />investigated all potential sources of losses, but focused on leakage in the water distribution system <br />and on the accuracy of metering at the point of delivery to the customer. This effort was continued <br />the following year to compare the results of the system's performance following corrective measures <br />taken to reduce leakage and improve the accuracy of metering. The results of the 1994 water audit. <br />showed that the gross amount of unaccounted-for water was 41.6%. In the 1995 water audit, this <br />figure had dropped to 28.5%, a 13% decrease over the prior year. In addition, the estimated <br />effectiveness of leak repairs performed in the last quarter of 1996 is likely to reduce the <br />unaccounted-for water to approximately 20%. The summary results of the two years of water audits <br />is presented in Attachment B: - - , , - , - - - , <br /> <br />1.5 Leak Survey Results (1994) <br />During the summer of 1994, the entire 57 miles of potable water distribution system were surveyed <br />for leaks. A total of 75 leaks were identified in the survey, with an estimated loss of up to 0.85 <br />million gallons per day (MGD). This equates to 25.8% of the average annual delivery of 3.3 MGD <br />treated water to the system. <br /> <br />Of the 75 leaks, 33 were classified as leaking fire hydrants, 2 were leaking customer service lines, <br />and 18 were mainline leaks. Up to 50% of the leakage was attributable to 11 of those mainline leaks, <br /> <br />7 <br />