My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CBT/WG Water Sharing Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
CBT/WG Water Sharing Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 11:57:12 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Ag/Muni Grant
Applicant
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Project Name
Ag Options
Title
Interruptible Supply Contracts for Water-Sharing Between the Colorado Big Thompson and Windy Gap Projects
Date
1/1/1996
County
Larimer
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
Document Relationships
NCWCD Ag Options Program Applic
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Award Letter
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
NCWCD Ag Options Program Prog Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, - <br /> <br />The Windy Gap Project, completed in 1985, was built to provide additional water <br />supply for municipal and industrial use along the northern Front Range. The Project is <br />owned and operated by NCWCD's Municipal Subdistrict. It has its own water rights, <br />separate from the C-BT Project, but relies primarily on C-BT Project facilities to deliver <br />the water. Estimated yield for the Windy Gap Project is 48,000 af/yr. The 480 shares in <br />the Project are currently owned by ten municipalities and industrial users. <br /> <br />Integrated operations of the two Projects <br /> <br />NCWCD's board of directors has adopted an integrated operations approach for <br />the C-BT and Windy Gap Projects in order to maximize benefits to the water users <br />served by both Projects. This approach is embodied in the amended carriage contract <br />("the amendatory contract") for Windy Gap water, entered into by NCWCD, the <br />Municipal Subdistrict, and the Bureau of Reclamation effective March 1, 1990. <br /> <br />One feature of the integrated operations concept is borrowing of C-BT water by <br />the Windy Gap Project (also called "in-lieu delivery") in which C-BT water may be used <br />to meet Windy Gap demand. The borrowed water is to be accounted for and repaid to <br />the C-BT Project. The amendatory contract, ~lO(b), provides that this borrowing will be <br />permitted only if C-BT allottees are not injured by the borrowing. This requirement is <br />referred to as the "non-injury criterion". <br /> <br />NCWCD's board of directors on December 13, 1991 adopted operating criteria <br />for integrated operations of the two Projects, setting out guidelines to ensure that in-lieu <br />delivery of C-BT water to Windy Gap would meet the non-injury requirement. The <br />Operating Criteria provide that any water borrowed by Windy Gap will be considered as <br />part of the available water pool when the annual C-BT quota is fixed. (Operating <br />Criteria, ~1) In order to borrow C-BT water, the Windy Gap participant must maintain <br />a back-up supply of water that will be available to the District on call. (Operating <br />Criteria, ~10) This back-up supply may be in the form of C-BT units owned by the <br />participant, contracts to use C-BT units owned by another allottee, or other water rights. <br /> <br />This study focuses on the second of these alternatives -- contracts to use another <br />allottee's C-BT units to repay the water debt owed to the C-BT Project by the Windy <br />Gap participant. The use of interruptible supply, or dry-year options, contracts has been <br />the subject of considerable interest in the western United States in recent years. Under <br />these contracts, the buyer receives a right to use the seller's water upon the occurrence <br />of stated conditions. In other years, the water continues to be used by the seller.2 <br /> <br />In the context of C-BT/Windy Gap integrated operations, the contracts would <br />provide that when water had been borrowed from the C-BT Project by Windy Gap and <br />could not be repaid from available Windy Gap supplies, the District would call in C-BT <br />units held under the contract. Thus, there would be no risk that C-BT alIottees would be <br /> <br />2 For further information on these options arrangements, see the consultant's <br />August 1994 report to the District, "Dry Year Options for Water Supply". <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.