Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> SECTION A - FOR ALL RESPONDENTS (cont.) <br />6. Based on what you currently know about interruptible supply contract arrangements. do you <br /> think they're worth investigating as a supply alternative for northern Colorado? <br /> Yes No Don't know <br /> Why? <br />7. Since the District does not intend to set the price. how do you think the price for interruptible <br /> supply contracts should be set? <br /> FIxed offer by buyer <br /> Buyer to make initial offer. followed by negotiations with potential sellers to determine final <br /> price <br /> Sellers to submit bids; all sellers whose bids are accepted will receive same price (equivalent to <br /> highest bid accepted) <br />8. What date do you think should be set as the deadline for the buyer to give notice that the <br /> water will be taken that year? <br /> Please explain why you selected that date <br /> <br />IF YOU DO NGT USE C-BT WA1ER FOR AGRICUL1URAL PURPOSES, PLEASE SKIP <br />QUESTIONS 9-14 AND GO ON TO SECTION C. <br /> <br />IF YOU ARE AN AGRICULTIJRAL USER. PLEASE PROCEED TO SECTIONS B AND C <br /> <br />\ SECTION B . FOR AGRICULTURAL WATER USERS I <br />9. If the water is used in agriculture. what crops do you raise using C-BT-supplied water? <br /> com dry beans oats grass/pasture hay <br /> sugar beets onions potatoes wheat <br /> alfalfa hay barley carrots other vegetables <br /> other <br />10. Would you consider entering into an interruptible supply contract as proposed by NCWCD? <br /> (Remember. this isJust a survey. You're not obligated in any way if you answer ''Yes''.) <br /> Yes No Don't know <br /> How many C-BT units miIzht you be willing to make available for transfer under an option <br /> contract? <br />11. Do you think other C-BT unit-holders in your area might be interested in entering Into <br /> interruptible supply contracts for dry-year transfers? <br /> Yes No Don't know <br /> <br />2 <br />A-1 <br />