Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.~ <br />) <br />j <br />I <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />CHAPTER 5 (continued) <br />SELECTED WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-10 <br />Residential Measures ........................ <. . . . . . . . . . . . .5-10 <br />CommerciallIndustrial Water Conservation Measures ........;........ 5-13 <br />Public/Utility Water Conservation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .5-13 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 6 RATES AND REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-1 <br /> <br />Metering. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 <br /> <br />Rate Structure ......................................... 6-2 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 7 WATER CONSERVATION BENEFIT <br />TO COST ANALYSIS ................................... 7-1 <br />ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TIIE CONSERVATION PROGRAM. . . . . . . . .. 7-1 <br />Conservation Program Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 7-1 <br />Quantitative Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2 <br />Present Worth Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 <br />Qualification of Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 <br />Qualitative Evaluation Criteria ............................... 7-6 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 8 WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. . . . . . " 8-1 <br />CONSERVATION AND WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING ........... 8-1 <br />Conservation Measure Implementation .......................... 8-1 <br /> <br />APPENDIX A COLORADO CONSERVATION ACT AND GRANT PROGRAM <br />APP~IX_B.WA~J)~rA]~lJLA.TIOl'>rL d u.H____ <br />APPENDIX C WATER USER'S SURVEY <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />21-6657 <br />