Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br /> <br /><.~ <br /> <br />-.<.-.; <br />r-:-~.' (,,1'-\ 0.' \ f' nn:~. "\ \ <br />~j~~~ ?,l '91'.} ) <br /> <br />\~ <br /> <br />(.. <br /> <br />Ok <br /> <br />,) <br /> <br />~/'-I' <br />,\<:.u,\) 1\\ <br />CO,<, <br /> <br />October 29, 1979 <br /> <br />Charles ,r. BeiE:e, Es'l. <br />Fairfield " Woods <br />950 Sevenlleenth st., Suite 1600 <br />Denver, Colorado 30202 <br /> <br />He: Objections by S. E. Consevvancy DistrIct to lUnimum <br />Stream Flow Cases, _Water DiviRion No. f\ <br />Case Nos. W-3008(W-3009, W-3015, YI-3053('11-305f, \V-30G8, <br />.-3071, VI-3077, .-30811W-3082, W-3085(1-3088, W-3090 <br /> <br />Dear ~!r. Beise: <br /> <br />1'hank you for your letter of Octc'~eil.'r12, 1079, reg!:.:nling the <br />above-mentioned cases. <br /> <br />If you review once again the location of these fIlIngs, you <br />will notice that all of the above-mentioned cases involve hif':h <br />mountain natural lil.ke levels and have no e-ffeet wha tsot;.'ver OIl <br />the Fryingpan-Arl;anf;as project nor would th(~se f1183 o'ffect (l.:1Y <br />future exchange plans the Project mny havp-. There-forB. I feel <br />a Stipulation similar to that ap;rced upon for tLe I1:!.vision 2 <br />cases would be unnecessary. <br /> <br />However, I will be sending, shortly, the Sti.pulaticn: W0 agrce:! <br />upon for the remalning cases in Division 2. <br /> <br />Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Connie L. Pet orson <br />Assistant Attorney General <br />Natural Resources Section <br /> <br />CLP: jb <br />ee: Jim Daber / <br />Duane Helton v" <br />