Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />, " <br />, , <br />'<,,;-' <br /> <br />pro se. <br /> <br />by J.. Lowell Goemmer for Goernmer Land and Li vestack, <br /> <br />Robert YarDourgh for Golden Cycle Land Corporation, Dwight <br /> <br />A. Harris.on for the Dwight A. Harrison Corporation. J. D. <br /> <br />Dye. Harry R.. Will is and the Southeastern Colorado W<3ter (on- <br /> <br />servanCy District, repr€sented by Charles aeise of Fairfield <br /> <br />and Woods. <br /> <br />4. This malter w~s set for Term Day, September 11, <br /> <br />1979 at which time appearances ....'ere made by the opp' icant <br /> <br />and the Southeas.tern ColoradO Water Conservancy District. <br /> <br />Or) said Terlll Ooy, this ijl~tter was set for pretrial confer- <br /> <br />enCB. Jarluary 7, 1930. <br /> <br />Only the aDpl icant ;3p[)€ared for thE' <br /> <br />pretrial corlferencc at wtlich time this matter was set for <br /> <br />t rial, <br />i <br /> <br />'-'eIY <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />1no. <br /> <br />5. Ttldt the Southeast~rn Colorado Water Conservancy <br /> <br />District withdrew its statement of opposition, December 20, <br /> <br />197'-1. <br /> <br />b. T11~t Floyd K. Murr, attorney at law, entered <br /> <br />hiS df")j.)l.!drunCe for Harry R. will is and Goemer Lund and Live- <br /> <br />stock. <br /> <br />7. Ttlat the Golden Cycle land Corporation withdrew <br /> <br />its stotenlent of opposition, by and through its vice- <br /> <br />presitlent, D. E. Ri ley, AprilllJ 1980. <br /> <br />u. That the objector, Dwight A. HDrrison Corpora- <br /> <br />tion, f<.!iled to answer the first set of interrogatories and <br /> <br />request for production servad upon said objector and a motion <br /> <br />to dismis~ the oojector's statement of opposition based <br /> <br />upon said fililure to dnswer was filed by the applicant on <br /> <br />Apri 1 24' 1980. <br /> <br />Said objector agreed to the stipulation <br /> <br />which is referenced in this decree and incorporated herein <br /> <br />and the olotion to dismiss was withdrawn by the <Jpplicant. <br /> <br />9. TIle objectors are owners and users of surf~ce <br /> <br />wat~r rights in I-later Division No.2. <br /> <br />With the exception <br /> <br />of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District and <br /> <br />~2- <br />