Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the summer flow recommendation based upon meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter <br />flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Partv Date Q 250%-40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />WWW/QR 11117/98 6.99 17.5-2.8 ? 0.5(1) <br /> <br />BLM 4/16/96 10.97 27.4-4.4 7.1 2,5 <br />DOWIWWW 4/15/99 6.19 15.5 - 2,5 10.5 3.8 <br />DOW/WWW 4/15/99 6.91 17,3 - 2.8 7,0 6.0 <br /> <br />WWW/QR 11/17/98 7.08 17.7 - 2.8 19,5OT LO(I) <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW - Division of Wildlife WWW - WW Wheeler QR _ Queen ofthe River <br />(I) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS StaglDg Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendations <br />The BLM recommended a 7,0 cfs summer flow and a 2,5 cfs winter flow based on their April <br />161h, 1996, data collection effort. An alternative flow recommendation, based on additional data <br />collected by WWW/QR, of 6.0 cfs, May 1 - July 31, 4.0 cfs August 1 - October 31 and 3 cfs, <br />November 1 - April 30, was proposed by the City of Cripple Creek and Cripple Creek/Victor <br />Mining Company, The WWW/QR flow recommendations were based on an adjustment of the <br />CWCB/CDOW 1 ftIsec velocity criteria standard for summer flows down to 0.8 ft/sec (See <br />WWW/QR Executive Summary). The CWCB tabled action on this flow recommendation until <br />CWCB staff could review the additional data collected by WWW/QR and to collect additional <br />data, if necessary, <br /> <br />Staff reviewed the data collected by the BLM and WWW/QR and decided to collect two more <br />additional data sets, bringing the total number of data sets for review to five. The summer flow <br />recommendations, which met 3 of 3 criteria and are within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS <br />model fall somewhere between 10.5 and 7.0 cfs (See Table 1). Averaging the three summer flow <br />recommendations gives a summer recommendation of 8.2 cfs. The winter flow <br />recommendations which met 2 of 3 criteria and are within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS <br />model fall somewhere between 6.0 and 2.5 cfs (See Table 1). Averaging the three winter flow <br />recommendations gives a summer recommendation of 4.1 cfs, <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agencies' biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydro graph was derived from data collected by the USGS <br />stream gage for Fourmile Creek below Cripple Creek (ID #07096250), which has a drainage area <br />of 272 square miles (see Gage Summary in Appendix C), The period of record for this gage is <br />1992 to present, the period of record used by staff in their analysis was 1992 - 1997, or five years <br />of record, The estimated drainage area of Fourmile Creek upstream and including High Creek is <br />246 square miles and the drainage area upstream of Cripple Creek is approximately 257 square <br />miles, Tables 2 and 3 below display the estimated flow of Fourmile Creek at the confluence with <br />High and Cripple Creeks, in terms of a percentage of exceedence. The orange shading highlights <br />how often the summer flow has been available and the blue shading highlights how often the <br />winter flow has been available. <br /> <br />, <br />