Laserfiche WebLink
*RIC RANGE OF VARIABILITY AS A CONTEXT FOR RESTORATION 217 <br /> difficult to infer the aggradational history there. Interpretation of old,though only 5c of that layer is preserved,suggesting only <br /> the GPR image suggests previous coarse sediment deposition. a brief period of gradual sedimentation in a regime dominated <br /> The most recent sample of organic-rich sediments is—299years by episodic debris flows and overbank deposits. <br /> Six of the deepest auger and excavator pits were selected <br /> from across the wetland to estimate the relative contributions <br /> Table I. Radiocarbon sample descriptions of different aggradational processes (Table II). XS5 @240m, <br /> Pit 17 on XS3, and Pit 11 on XS1 were selected to represent <br /> Age(years the western portion of the wetland (Figure 2). XS5 @50m, <br /> before present, XS3 @158 m, and Long E @429 m on XS2 were selected for <br /> Location' Depth(cm) BP(2009)) Material the eastern portion of the wetland.The east side of the wetland <br /> aggraded primarily through peat(-50%)and overbank deposi- <br /> Long W @ 150m 115 734±40 Peat <br /> Long W @ 150m 80 189±40 Peat tion (-30%), and the west side through debris flows (-50%) <br /> o <br /> Long W @ 150m 175 2399±65 Gyttja and overbank deposition (-35%). Differences in process from <br /> SW hole 5o 109±33 2 Peat west to east are probably influenced by several factors includ- <br /> SW hole 144 2334±45 Peat ing the tributary fan at the head of the wetland that forces the <br /> SW hole 313 4089±50 Peat channel to the west,groundwater that supports peat production <br /> SW hole 337 4249±50 Peat in the east,differing lithologies(and therefore debris-flow sus- <br /> XS3 @ 158 m 110-125 679±45 Gyttja ceptibility)and,more recently,localized deposition at the head <br /> XS3 @ 158m 155-170 1459±50 Peat of the wetland that pushed the active channel to the west. <br /> XS3 @ 158 in 320-330 3389±65 Peat Although recent deposits to the west side of the valley differ <br /> XS4@ 112.5 in 125 299±45 Gyttja and from the immediately preceding deposits, several pre-impact <br /> 1 Figure 2 wood pieces debris-flow deposits of the past 4000 yr show similar textures. <br /> 2<120(99.4±0.4 pMC) The increased frequency of recent events, however, distin- <br /> guishes them from older deposits. In all, less than 10%of the <br /> wetland fill can be attributed to beaver-pond fill. Similarly, <br /> investigations of sediment dynamics and beaver on the <br /> Sediment descriptions from SW Hole Colorado River suggest dams in higher order streams function <br /> primarily by encouraging overbank deposition. In-channel <br /> deposition is less likely to be preserved because of frequent <br /> Depth(m) clay silt Sand Gravel breaching of dams and removal of in-channel sediment <br /> f m c <br /> (Westbrook et aL,2010). <br /> Dark brown sand-silt with organics <br /> large wood chunk and charcoal at 0.24 m <br /> `. <br /> 0.5 m Dark reddish brownsand with vegetation Comparison of recent and pre-disturbance <br /> Age at 0.5 m=109 BP aggradation rates <br /> Radiocarbon dating of peat and gyttja was used to identify <br /> Dark brown peat dry in places the rate of aggradation and the timing of depositional events <br /> .Om <br /> (Table I).Aggradation rates in Lulu City wetland range from 4 to <br /> 20 cm/100 yr for most of the 4000 yr sampled for this study,but <br /> then increase to over 40 cm/100 yr during the past 100-200 years <br /> Age at 1.4m=2334 BP (Figure 8).Similar rates of—40 cm/100 yr for the past one to two <br /> 1.5 m centuries occur at three dated profiles:Long W@150 m,SW Hole, <br /> and XS4 @112.5 m(Figure 2).The fourth dated profile is at XS3 <br /> @158 m where the uppermost(youngest)date is—620 yr BP and <br /> 1.1-1.25 m below the ground surface. It is likely that the rate of <br /> Gray sand and silt,well sorted,no organics aggradation at XS3 @158m was substantially higher during the <br /> 2.0 m <br /> most recent one to two centuries, but the temporal resolution of <br /> aggradation rates is limited by the samples collected; the <br /> assumption of a constant rate of aggradation between known <br /> dates is probably invalid. It is possible that aggradation rates <br /> 2.5m would be spatially heterogeneous throughout the wetland, <br /> although given the strong correlation of other dated samples, <br /> Gray medium<oarsesand,wet XS3 @158 m is expected to have followed a similar pattern of <br /> rapid aggradation during the past two centuries(Figure 9). <br /> 3.0m Variation in pre-disturbance aggradation rates is also appar- <br /> MPeat, eat�3.1m=4089 BP ent. Aggradation occurred faster during the period from j <br /> 4200-2500yr BP than from 2500-200yr BP (Figure 8). The <br /> -- Sand,no organics higher aggradation from 4200-2500yr BP corresponds to a <br /> eat' m 424 BP period recognized as cooler and drier than present (Fall, <br /> 3.5m • :" `% '•" Gravels,could not auger 1997), while the last 2000yr were generally similar to the <br /> Figure 6. SW Hole is in the southwest portion of the wetland.This modern climate (Vierling, 1998), although cooler and more <br /> was dug with shovels to —2 m, then augered to 3.5 m. Radiocarbon severe temperatures were present during the Little Ice Age from <br /> dates from 0.5 and 1.4m depth indicate 90 cm of peat accumulation 700 to 100 yr BP(Fall, 1985;Doerner,2007).Peat aggradation <br /> in —2200years prior to —50cm of sediment deposition in the past rates are positively correlated with precipitation and tempera- <br /> two centuries. ture, although local controls also influence growth (Ovenden, <br /> Copyright @ 2011 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd. Earth Surf.Process.Landforms,Vol.37,209-222(2012) <br />