Laserfiche WebLink
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LOORMS • <br /> Earth Surf.Process.Landforms 37,209-222(2012) <br /> Copyright©2011 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd. <br /> Published online 21 November 2011 in Wiley Online Library <br /> (wileyonlinelibrary.corn)DOI:10.1002/esp.2249 <br /> Historic range of variability in geomorphic <br /> processes as a context for restoration: Rocky <br /> Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA <br /> Zan Rubin,*Sara L. Rathburn,Ellen Wohl and Dennis L. Harry <br /> Department of Geosciences,Colorado State University, Fort Collins,CO, USA <br /> Received 12 May 2011;Revised 4 October 2011;Accepted 10 October 2011 <br /> *Correspondence to:Zan Rubin,University of California,Berkeley,Ca,USA.E-mail:ZanRubin@berkeley.edu <br /> D <br /> Earth Surrace Processes and Landforms <br /> ABSTRACT: Evaluation of historic range of variability(HRV) is an effective tool for determining baseline conditions and providing <br /> context to researchers and land managers seeking to understand and enhance ecological function.Incorporating HRV into restoration <br /> planning acknowledges the dynamic quality of landscapes by allowing variability and disturbance at reasonable levels and permitting <br /> riverine landscapes to adapt to the physical processes of their watersheds. HRV analysis therefore represents a practical (though <br /> under-utilized) method for quantifying process-based restoration goals. We investigated HRV of aggradational processes in the <br /> subalpine Lulu City wetland in Rocky Mountain National Park to understand the impacts of two centuries of altered land use <br /> and to guide restoration planning following a human-caused debris flow in 2003 that deposited up to 1 m of sand and gravel in the <br /> wetland. Historic aerial photograph interpretation, ground penetrating radar surveys, and trenching, coring, and radiocarbon dating <br /> of valley-bottom sediments were used to map sediment deposits, quantify aggradation rates, and identify processes(in-channel and <br /> overbank fluvial deposition, direct hillslope input, beaver pond filling, peat accumulation) creating alluvial fill within the wetland. <br /> Results indicate(i) the Lulu City wetland has been aggrading for several millennia, (ii) the aggradation rate of the past one to two <br /> centuries is approximately six times higher than long-term pre-settlement averages,(iii)during geomorphically active periods,short-term <br /> aggradation rates during the pre-settlement period were probably much higher than the long-term average rate,and(iv)the processes of <br /> aggradation during the last two centuries are the same as historic processes of aggradation.Understanding the HRVof aggradation rates <br /> and processes can constrain management and restoration scenarios by quantifying the range of disturbance from which a landscape can <br /> recover without active restoration.Copyright©2011 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd. <br /> KEYWORDS: historic range of variability;restoration;aggradation;debris flow;Colorado River <br /> Introduction and disturbance within the range of historic levels and thus <br /> allows riverine landscapes to create desired habitats through <br /> The physical and biological forms and processes of landscapes adaptation to the physical processes of their watersheds.The dis- <br /> vary spatially and temporally and are increasingly altered by cussion herein follows the broad definition of disturbance offered <br /> human activities. Historic range of variability(HRV) has been by Pickett and White(1985)and Lake(2000),as an event when <br /> investigated as a potential tool for envisioning baseline condi- disrupting forces are applied to habitat space occupied by a pop- <br /> tions and providing context to researchers and land managers ulation,community,or ecosystem.Our interest is not specifically <br /> seeking to understand,enhance,or preserve ecological integrity in how disturbances such as floods or debris flows relate to non- <br /> (Landres etal.,1999;Keane etal.,2009).HRV is defined herein as disturbance conditions,but in how the magnitude and frequency <br /> the magnitude,frequency,and/or duration of specific processes of a disturbance regime may change with human alteration. <br /> such as fire or debris flows prior to intensive human impacts. Disturbances are important processes that drive habitat het- <br /> Understanding HRV facilitates'process-based'restoration,a con- erogeneity and encourage species diversity by accommodating <br /> ceptual framework supported by a growing number of restoration both colonizing and resident species at the scale of the dis- <br /> practitioners and scholars (Wohl et al., 2005; Kondolf et al., turbed site and also at a larger landscape scale that includes <br /> 2006), that seeks to re-establish the functions and trajectory of undisturbed patches(Connell,1978;Reice etal.,1990).Com- <br /> watershed processes and the habitat structure and variation to monly, post-disturbance colonization is rapid, with most <br /> which native species are adapted. Process-based restoration is a riverine studies showing recovery of species richness and abun- <br /> pragmatic way of targeting the varied(and commonly unknown) dance within 3 years except in instances of persistent alteration <br /> habitat needs of all native species by recovering the physical to physical habitat (Yount and Niemi, 1990; Detenbeck et al., <br /> functions that successfully supported these species.Incorporating 1992). Illustrating the regenerative aspects of disturbance, <br /> HRV into restoration planning acknowledges the dynamic quality maximum species richness has been found in the first two <br /> of landscapes by accommodating and managing for variability decades following a flood (Friedman et al., 1996). <br />