My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Irrigated Acreage Identification and Assesment Final Report
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
Irrigated Acreage Identification and Assesment Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2017 11:04:10 AM
Creation date
1/12/2017 10:14:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
Irrigated Acreage Identification and Assesment for the West Slope of Colorado
Description
FInal Report
Decision Support - Doc Type
Report
Date
1/4/2001
DSS Category
GIS
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Western Slope
Prepared By
DWR, CWCB
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> E. Deliverables Attached as Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A USBR Classification <br /> Exhibit B Classification explanation Map <br /> Exhibit C 1993 Polygons Shaded by Crop Type <br /> Exhibit D 1999 Polygons Shaded by Crop Type <br /> Exhibit E Irrigated vs. Non-irrigated from the 1995 imagery <br /> Exhibit F Irrigated vs. Non-irrigated from the classification <br /> Exhibit G Polygonal Changes since 1993 <br /> Exhibit H 1999 polygons shaded by Structure ID <br /> Exhibit I DOQQ's 4m vs. 1 m <br /> F. Recommendations <br /> 1. It is recommended that the State pursue completing the West Slope irrigated acreage <br /> project. The cooperative agreement with the USBR saves the State of Colorado $39,000 <br /> on the LandSat TM imagery and $15,000 on the DOQQs. The project benefits the USBR <br /> by providing them with the finished data set that is more accurate than their current map. <br /> 2. It is recommended that the 1993 polygon data set be used for attribute data, and as a guide <br /> for the updating procedures but that digitizing of polygons be performed from the DOQQ's. <br /> 3. It is recommended that the labor for the project be contracted out. The Division of Water <br /> Resources does not have the FTE available to perform 12 months of work. The Division of <br /> Water Resources could provide technical guidance for the project, and help QA/QC the <br /> data as decisions are being made. <br /> Continuity into the future <br /> Technology keeps refining the process of studying irrigated acreage. In 1993 imagery was <br /> unavailable at reasonable prices, which forced us to use paper orthophotographs. That project took 5 <br /> years, many cooperating agencies, and several FTE, and was never entirely completed. <br /> The new methodology is still expensive, but will take much less time, fewer human resources, and be <br /> more accurate. The transfer of attribute data proves that the past work performed on projects can be <br /> used. <br /> The switch from paper to digital imagery will 'e&sen the labor commitment for the next update. The <br /> trend is that imagery ic getting cheaper, and is of higher resolution. We should get more accurate <br /> data over time with similar or less costly labor due to the fact that we will not be changing technology. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.