My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Tamarack Plan Implementation and Governance Issues
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Tamarack Plan Implementation and Governance Issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2017 10:10:33 AM
Creation date
1/10/2017 10:10:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership ( aka Platte River Cooperative Agreement [CA]; aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program [PRRIP])
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Title
Tamarack Plan Implementation and Governance Issue
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Contract/Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TAMARACK PLAN <br /> IMPLEMENTATION AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES <br /> This Paper proposes an institutional structure for the implementation and governance of the <br /> Tamarack Plan. The Paper is meant to help frame discussions concerning issues related to <br /> development of the Tamarack Plan. <br /> 1. Background <br /> A number of species located in the Central Platte region in Nebraska have been listed under the <br /> Endangered Species Act. Under Section 7 of the ESA, federal agencies with discretionary <br /> authority over permitting or funding are required to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service if the exercise of that discretion may affect the listed species or their designated critical <br /> habitat. The current position of the FWS is that any federal discretionary action related to an <br /> activity that causes depletions to or changes in timing of water flows in the Central Platte region <br /> will cause "jeopardy" to the species and cannot proceed without additional mitigation. In <br /> particular, the FWS has identified flow levels in the Platte River in Central Nebraska("Target <br /> Flows")that they believe are necessary for the species. It has also compared actual flows in the <br /> river with the Target Flows and determined that there is an annual average 417,000 acre-foot <br /> shortage between actual flows and the Target Flows. The FWS attributes these shortages to <br /> historic water development. <br /> In an attempt to avoid the costs and uncertainty associated with individual Section 7 <br /> consultations under the ESA,the State of Colorado and Colorado water users have participated in <br /> an a comprehensive process to develop a"Program" that would provide ESA compliance for all <br /> existing and future water uses in Colorado. As originally proposed in the 1997 Cooperative <br /> Agreement among the States of Colorado,Nebraska, Wyoming and the U.S. Department of <br /> Interior,the parties have put aside the requirements to make-up the entire 417,000 acre-feet of <br /> shortages to the Target Flows and have identified a goal to reduce the shortages by an average of <br /> 130,000 to 150,000 acre-feet per year. As proposed,this water, along with land obtained for <br /> habitat, would constitute the mitigation needed to offset the impact of existing water projects on <br /> the habitat in the Platte River in Central Nebraska during the first increment(13 years) of the <br /> Program. ESA compliance for future water related activities in each of the three states will be <br /> afforded if their depletive impacts to the Target Flows are offset. The water mitigation for <br /> subsequent increments of the proposed Program will be adjusted through the process of adaptive <br /> management based upon an evaluation of the effects to the species and their associated habitat <br /> from the additional water and land provided in the first increment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.