Laserfiche WebLink
Paradox Valley Unit <br /> Proposal for Evaporation Pond <br /> permissions would be obtained prior to on-site encapsulation. The encapsulated <br /> area would be graded to match surrounding landscape. If absolutely necessary, <br /> the salt could be transferred to a Reclamation landfill for encapsulation similarly. <br /> The need for long term monitoring of the encapsulation is not anticipated since <br /> leakage would be minimal and any impact from the leakage would be <br /> insignificant compared to the existing brine groundwater seepage into the river <br /> that occurs naturally. River erosion/encroachment would be unlikely as the <br /> encapsulation would be of significant distance away from the river and would be <br /> separated from the river by the large existing earthen dike. <br /> Post Pilot Test Site Management <br /> Upon conclusion of the pilot study which could last for several years,there could <br /> be generally one of two directions going forward. One direction would be the <br /> pilot study was successful and more evaporation ponds would be needed. In this <br /> case the site could continue the evaporation operation until the pond was filled up <br /> with salt. The completed site would be covered completely with an appropriate <br /> barrier material and topped with at least three feet of soil. Alternatively, the site <br /> could be closed as described in the paragraph before under the Migratory Bird <br /> Monitoring/Management Plan. <br /> The other direction would be no further application of the evaporation pond <br /> method due to finding of significant impact or not cost effective. The site would <br /> be closed as described under the Migratory Bird Monitoring/Management Plan. <br /> Conclusion <br /> The Paradox Valley is a very significant source of salt loading into the Colorado <br /> River. 115,000 tons of salt at this site are currently being disposed by the current <br /> deep well injection each year. This method has been relatively successful since <br /> full-scale operations were begun in 1996,but the increasing injection pressure <br /> requirements and corresponding seismic problems (including potential quitting of <br /> the well)warrant the exploration of an alternate disposal method that includes <br /> another injection well and evaporation ponds. Unacceptable levels of seismic <br /> movement at the Unit would most likely require the well to be abandoned. The <br /> negative impact of full salt loading into the Colorado River from the Paradox <br /> Valley in a well abandonment scenario would be widespread. <br /> The Paradox Valley Unit will be vital in helping the Colorado River Basin <br /> Salinity Control Program meet salinity goals of the future. The Unit benefits <br /> millions of people and saves great effort that would otherwise be required to <br /> remove the salt after being introduced into the river. Evaporation ponds have <br /> proven to be a highly successful and cost-effective salt removal and/or <br /> containment method in a number of notable large-scale projects including the <br /> Intrepid and Great Salt Lake Minerals Company ponds in Utah,the South Bay <br /> ponds in California,the Useless Loop and Onslow ponds in Western Australia, <br /> and the Dead Sea ponds in Israel and Jordan. The pilot evaporation pond will aid <br /> 12 <br />