My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BLM Extention Letter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
BLM Extention Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2017 4:28:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 3:42:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Documents related to the Upper Colorado River Wild and Sceni Stakeholders Process
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/21/2009
Author
BLM
Title
BLM Extention Letter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Administration of Existing Senior Water Rights <br /> Basic Concept <br /> The two main calling water rights on the main stem of the Colorado River are the <br /> Shoshone Rights and a group of rights known as the Grand Valley rights or the Cameo <br /> Call, actually 3 different structures. The Shoshone rights are capable of calling for water <br /> year round (1250 to 1408 cfs), while the Grand Valley rights are irrigation rights which <br /> can only call for water April through October. These are absolute water rights, which <br /> under dry to average hydrologic conditions may govern the flows on the Colorado River <br /> through Glenwood Canyon during portions of the year. The Shoshone senior right is the <br /> focal point of this concept as it is the most senior water right and located at the bottom of <br /> the study area. However the Grand Valley rights do receive the delivery of the supplies <br /> from the Green Mountain Reservoir Historic Users Pool(HUP). <br /> II. Benefit to Stream Segments <br /> The year round utilization of the Shoshone right has the ability to keep flows of around <br /> 1250 cubic feet per second (cfs) in the Colorado River at the Dotsero gage. The <br /> Shoshone right is more protective for the Glenwood Canyon segment. The Grand Valley <br /> rights call for water from all upstream junior rights. During portions of the year, flows on <br /> the Colorado River have historically been maintained by the operation of the Shoshone <br /> rights, and to a lesser extent the Grand Valley rights. <br /> III. Permanent Flow Protection <br /> When operating at full capacity, the Shoshone rights offer year round protection in the <br /> operation of existing water rights administration. The administration of these rights has <br /> largely shaped the historic hydrograph. The Grand Valley rights accept delivery of HUP <br /> supplies, generally from August through October, but the Grand Valley Project Power <br /> Plant water rights may have the potential to affect the existing water rights administration <br /> year round. <br /> IV. Pros and Cons <br /> Pros <br /> • These are established water rights in place to call for water under dry to average <br /> hydrologic conditions and that can help maintain ORV's during portions of the year. <br /> • Reliance on these existing rights allows for upstream operational flexibility to deliver <br /> water to calling rights provided replacements are made upstream of Segment 4. <br /> • Grand Valley HUP deliveries take place during drier conditions and therefore benefit <br /> the study area reaches when other concepts may not provide physical supply. <br /> • Segments 4 through 7 are downstream of Green Mountain and therefore would <br /> benefit from HUP releases. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.