My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Initial River Protection Tools
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Initial River Protection Tools
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 3:08:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 3:08:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Documents related to the Lower Colorado River Wild and Scenic Staekholder Collaborative
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
6
Date
6/30/2010
Author
River Protection Workgroup
Title
Initial River Protection Tools
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Designation of(a) Research Natural Areas ("RNAs") for USFS lands and Areas <br /> of Critical Environmental Concern ("ACECs") for BLM-administered lands; and <br /> (b) suitable timber land and the establishment of allowable sale quantities for <br /> USFS lands. <br /> • Recommendation of lands for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation <br /> System ("NWPS"). (USFS only; BLM recommendations are considered through <br /> separate, legislative Environmental Impact Statements.) <br /> • Identification of river segments as eligible or suitable for inclusion in the National <br /> Wild and Scenic Rivers System('WSRS"). <br /> • Allocation of livestock forage ("AUMs") and areas available for livestock grazing <br /> on BLM-administered lands. <br /> The management of rivers and their associated values is subject to the overall <br /> desired outcomes described in an LMP. For instance, desired condition statements <br /> about maintaining or enhancing water quality could frame the future management of <br /> rivers and their watersheds. The establishment of criteria, such as plan standards or <br /> guidelines, could further define management actions to be taken or the decision-space <br /> available during consideration of specific activities that may affect river values. <br /> General management area allocations pull together desired outcomes and <br /> management criteria and may establish the overall management approach for a given <br /> area. The management of streams located within these management areas could be <br /> affected by the levels of development or management activity associated with each <br /> management area. <br /> Specific designations or land allocations made in LMPs may also directly affect <br /> the management of rivers. The designation of an RNA or ACEC provides more specific <br /> guidance on management of the particular area. For instance, an ACEC intended to <br /> protect a rare aquatic plant community could require additional scientific study, <br /> management actions to enhance wetland vegetation or desired flow regimes, or design <br /> criteria for adjacent land uses to prevent degradation of the community. <br /> Recommendations for inclusion in the NWPS or findings of suitability for inclusion <br /> in the WSRS require the agencies to manage the identified lands or stream segments <br /> and adjacent corridors to preserve Congress'option to consider legislation either to <br /> establish a new Wilderness Area or a WSR. Such recommendations or findings may be <br /> accompanied by other LMP components, such as desired outcomes or management <br /> criteria to protect identified values pending action by Congress. In the case of a finding <br /> of suitability for inclusion as a WSR, the San Juan Public Lands Center("SJPLC") is <br /> required to manage the stream corridor to protect the ORVs identified in the LMP. If, for <br /> -6- . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.