Laserfiche WebLink
34 <br /> 1 cumulative flow at Thatcher . That ' s above the <br /> 2 project irrigated acreage and below, and this was • <br /> 3 used in the last three reviews covering ' 83 , ' 84 and <br /> 4 1985 to ' 94 , and ' 95 to 2004 , and this was a <br /> 5 relatively coarse assessment of project impacts . <br /> 6 Kansas for many years has expressed concerns <br /> 7 about this and so we are looking at some revisions <br /> 8 . to that analysis and I will be having a meeting <br /> 9 at - - I ' ll be scheduling and sending out an <br /> 10 interest , just an initial request of folks who have <br /> 11 time and are interested in discussing this to have a <br /> 12 meeting; probably in Pueblo, in February of 2014 . <br /> 13 So if you have any other questions , there ' s my • <br /> 14 contact information . We ' ll definitely provide this <br /> 15 as an exhibit , and at least electronically to the <br /> 16 board or to the Administration, and with that , I ' ll <br /> 17 take questions . <br /> 18 MR . HAYZLETT : Thank you , Andrew, and you <br /> 19 said you would present that as an exhibit , your <br /> 20 Power Point? <br /> 21 MR . +GILMORE : Yes . <br /> 22 MR . HAYZLETT : Okay . Any questions for <br /> 23 Andrew? <br /> 24 MR . BARFIE D : No . <br /> 25 MR . HAYZLETT : Hearing none , then, thank • <br />