My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150204 Application
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
C150204 Application
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 3:49:18 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 3:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
Colorado State University
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2005
Project Name
Drainage System Rehabilitation in the Arkansas Valley
CWCB Section
Finance
Contract/PO #
C150204
Grants - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
collection will be conducted by the participating drainage districts and reported as an addendum to the <br /> final report. This third year of data will be primarily from the beta drainage system site(see Table 3— <br /> Timeline of Research Activities). <br /> Phase I will involve: (1)mapping the current Lower Arkansas Valley drainage system as it is <br /> known and/or can be identified through fieldwork, showing the approximate alignment of known <br /> subsurface and surface drains and their interconnection. This will be followed by(2)a thorough cleaning <br /> of one of the smaller older subsurface and surface drainage district systems(beta system, see Figure 1)in <br /> the Lower Arkansas Valley(e.g.,the Kornman Drainage District,the McClave Drainage District,or a <br /> section of the Wiley of Big Bend Drainage District). <br /> These smaller subsurface drainage systems are generally known to be 2-3 miles in length. Phase <br /> I mapping and cleaning activities will: (a)provide information and experience needed to estimate the per <br /> mile cost of rehabilitating the entire subsurface and surface drainage system in the Lower Arkansas <br /> Valley under three different economic scenarios(discussed below), (b)provide information on potential <br /> changes in the drainage patterns as a result of drainage system rehabilitation(i.e.,through the cleaning of <br /> the beta system)and, (c)provide data to calculate the estimated benefit/cost ratio for the three different <br /> rehabilitation scenarios. <br /> Phase II will involve completing the mapping of the drainage systems,compiling data on <br /> potential changes(benefits)in the drainage of lands resulting from the cleaning of the beta system,and <br /> generate an action plan for the future rehabilitation and integration of subsurface and surface drainage <br /> systems in the Lower Arkansas Valley. <br /> Phase I Tasks <br /> Task 1 <br /> Organize and conduct a study tour for Lower Arkansas Valley drainage district board members to the <br /> South Columbia Basin Irrigation District,Pasco,Washington to view its drainage operation,maintenance <br /> and drainage record keeping program. This study tour is designed to assist the research advisory <br /> committee and to begin a dialogue about the future organizational structure of drainage districts in the <br /> Lower Arkansas Valley. One drainage district representative will be selected from each of the three <br /> counties(Otero,Bent and Prowers)to travel on the study tour to Washington. <br /> Task 2 <br /> Inventory and describe all known and/or visible features of the subsurface and surface drainage <br /> networks in Otero,Bent and Prowers counties. Develop a GPS/GIS base map of the drainage systems. <br /> Method: Locate all subsurface drains by: (1)first locating outlets in the wasteways,then, (2) <br /> aligning these outlets by surveying in existing manholes and other visible features in the <br /> irrigated fields identified by growers and drainage district representatives. <br /> Method: Ground penetrating radar(GPR)is as yet an untested method of locating the <br /> alignment of older tile drains. An item has been placed in the proposed budget to experiment <br /> with the use of GPR for the shallower subsurface drains. A recent report indicates that this <br /> methodology may be of use in the study.12 <br /> '2 Allred,B.J,N.R.Fausey,J.J.Daniels,C.Chjen,L.Peters,Jr,and H.Youn,Considerations for Using Ground <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.