Laserfiche WebLink
manholes are 42 inches in diameter and range in depth from eight to twelve feet. In addition,there are 15 <br /> groundwater pumps throughout the 200,000 acre service area of SCBID that evacuate drainage water out <br /> of sumps in closed basins that have no other discharge capabilities(i.e.,into wasteways or irrigation <br /> canals). <br /> The SCBID drainage system was initiated during the late 1950s,with additional improvements <br /> and additions occurring well into the late 1970s. Thus,it is about 30+years old. The cost of the SCBID <br /> drainage system is estimated to have been about 30 million dollars(1970 prices),based on an average <br /> cost of about$25,000 per mile of drain,plus an additional 45%in overhead planning and design costs <br /> borne by the federal agency engineers and economists(i.e.,Reclamation). At today's prices and <br /> technology,the cost of the system might range from$10 to$12 per linear foot,or$70 to$80 million for <br /> the 1200 miles of drains. <br /> The entire SCBID drainage system is maintained by three employees;one superintendent <br /> drainage technician and two field staff crew members. Excluding salaries and the financing of equipment <br /> originally purchased to maintain the drainage system,the annual budget for managing the drainage <br /> system of SCBID is about$13,000(i.e.,for materials and supplies). The major pieces of equipment <br /> purchased over the years for the subsurface drainage maintenance operation include a high-pressured jet <br /> cleaner($70,000),a 4000 gallon water truck($40,000),a six inch vacuum rig($50,000),a transmitter and <br /> receiver for locating and mapping buried tile drains($1,500),and a video inspection camera($40,000). A <br /> set of PowerPoint slides on the SCBID drainage maintenance program, including photos of the most <br /> important pieces of equipment for the program,are shown in the CD accompanying this proposal. <br /> Drainage assessments on the landowners under SCBID are levied on a per acre basis,without <br /> consideration of soil type or length of drains in a particular block/unit of the irrigation system. All lands <br /> in the district are considered to benefit from the drainage system,whether irrigated lands have drains or <br /> not. The O&M cost for the drainage system is a line item in the SCBID budget. Rural residential <br /> subdivisions may cause problems with the drainage system, such as the planting of trees/windbreaks <br /> around the residential lot. If a problem persists,a resolution is passed by the irrigation district to assess <br /> the subdivision an additional charge beyond what landowners are usually being assessed. <br /> In interviews with the staff of SCBID concerning the potential rehabilitation of the Lower <br /> Arkansas Valley subsurface and surface drainage system,the following ideas were explored: <br /> 1. The 25 drainage districts in the Lower Arkansas Valley may want to consider consolidating all of <br /> their activities together into one operational unit or drainage district authority. Even if this <br /> consolidation were to occur,the combined drainage system for the Lower Arkansas Valley <br /> (approximately 84 miles of tile drains and 107 miles of surface drains)would be measurably <br /> smaller than the 1200 miles and 3000 manholes managed by the three SCBID employees. <br /> Consolidation would provide the Lower Arkansas Valley growers with economies-of-scale in the <br /> use of drainage maintenance equipment,personnel,overall planning,purchasing of materials and <br /> supplies,etc. <br /> 2. Training of drainage district maintenance people would key off practices and technologies found <br /> in the sewer maintenance industry today. In fact,the entire SCBID drainage operation largely <br /> emulates the sewer industry,in terms of both equipment and methods of maintenance. <br /> 3. In purchasing equipment,the Lower Arkansas Valley drainage districts would look to acquiring <br /> used maintenance equipment. Arkansas Valley growers could possibly share the cost of some of <br /> the above-mentioned equipment with surrounding towns as well. The SCBID did rely on the City <br /> 11 <br />