My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150204 Application
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
C150204 Application
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 3:49:18 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 3:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
Colorado State University
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2005
Project Name
Drainage System Rehabilitation in the Arkansas Valley
CWCB Section
Finance
Contract/PO #
C150204
Grants - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Arkansas River, settled drains, and dilapidated observation manholes continue to be at the core of <br /> drainage problems in the lower valley. <br /> It is known that many of the drainage districts had problems meeting annual assessments during <br /> the Depression. This resulted in considerable deferred maintenance on the drainage systems. The <br /> Reconstruction Finance Corporation under the Roosevelt Administration provided funds to refinance <br /> many of the indebted district serial bonds. However,this refinancing was followed by another reduction <br /> in average annual farm income due to the termination of sugar production in the 1970s. This economic <br /> slump led to further deferred maintenance of the drainage systems. <br /> In subsequent years, farm income declined further,leading to reluctance on the part of growers to <br /> raise drainage district assessments to meet an emerging problem for crop production in the lower valley. <br /> Meanwhile,those growers who were familiar with the whereabouts of tile drain systems were beginning <br /> to pass on. Today,there is a core of older growers whose knowledge will be vital to any proposed <br /> rehabilitation of the lower valley's drainage systems. Action must be taken immediately to safeguard this <br /> important information. Their knowledge will be essential to the proposed study's success. <br /> It is known that many of the subsurface drains continue to carry substantial water. This is <br /> observable at identifiable outlets along wasteways,and by observing flows through very dilapidated <br /> wooden manholes throughout the lower valley. Some engineering designs of the drainage systems are <br /> available in the archives of local county assessor's offices. However,they are incomplete and often do <br /> not represent the final installation locations,particularly of the tile drain systems. Only the location of <br /> principal open collector drains is clearly observable. <br /> Over the years,and often due to the transfer of ownership of land,there has been a loss of <br /> knowledge of the whereabouts of the tile drains under farm ground leading to these open surface <br /> collectors. This has often led to the tile drains being damaged during land preparation or during the <br /> installation of natural gas and other utility pipelines in the valley. <br /> Although cropping and irrigation practices have changed over the years,the drainage network is <br /> still used to clear standing water from the land in wet years and to manage a generally high water table in <br /> normal years. Growers recently interviewed by the Sociology Water Lab affirm this fact. Even recent <br /> drought years have shown considerable flows in the surface drainage networks. The predominance of <br /> clay loam and loam soils in the Lower Arkansas Valley appears to be an important reason for the <br /> continued need of the drainage districts. The natural surface drainage off bench lands and from highline <br /> canals negotiating this natural surface drainage also contribute to the need for proper drainage(see Map <br /> 2). <br /> More modem drainage systems, such as those found in the U.S.Bureau of Reclamation's <br /> Columbia Basin Project in the State of Washington,were built with observation manholes located at <br /> every junction of lines in the tile drain system, and at the location of pipe size changes as well.10 It is <br /> believed that the drainage systems in the Lower Arkansas Valley were designed with a limited number of <br /> observation manholes,making it difficult to track the performance of the valley's drainage system over <br /> time. Manholes are also needed for maintenance, and a lack of adequately constructed manholes of a <br /> width and depth sufficient to access drains do not appear to have been part of the early design of drainage <br /> systems in the Lower Arkansas Valley. <br /> 1°Personal visit by the P.I.and discussions with Mr.Dan Morasch,Drainage Technician,South Columbia Basin <br /> Irrigation District,Pasco,Washington. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.