My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Lower South Platte River Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Lower South Platte River Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2015 10:59:50 AM
Creation date
11/20/2015 10:58:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contractor Name
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lower South Platte River Study <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> ' December 2001 <br /> 3.3 Local Permits <br /> ' In accordance with State Statute 1041, water projects must have the approval of the local <br /> County Commissioners if 1041 authority over water development has been approved in the <br /> ' county where the project is located. The projects will be located in Logan or Sedgwick <br /> County. If either county does not currently have State Statute 1041 authority over water <br /> projects, this authority could be added by the county prior to project construction. <br /> 3.4 Agency Consultations <br /> The NEPA process requires that consultation be held with key resource agencies. These <br /> ' often are completed in two steps—informal consultation prior to beginning the NEPA <br /> process and formal consultation during NEPA, including scoping of environmental studies. <br /> If the next phase of this investigation is authorized (Feasibility Study), we recommend that <br /> ' informal consultation be initiated if it is determined that the preferred alternative(s) will <br /> require a NEPA compliance effort. At present, we believe that several of the projects being <br /> considered will require federal permitting. <br /> ' 3.5 Potentials f mi tin <br /> or Avoiding Federal Permitting <br /> g <br /> ' Federal permitting through Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act can usually be avoided if <br /> the"discharge of dredge or fill materials into the navigable waters of the United States"can <br /> ' be avoided. Experience indicates that avoidance of this federal permitting process occurs <br /> when: <br /> ' • The project is not constructed on federal lands <br /> • Federal funds are not involved in the project <br /> ' • The project does not impact jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the United States. <br /> (As discussed in Section 5.5, there are several sites that have the potential to be <br /> exempt from Section 404 permitting requirements, thereby avoiding Federal <br /> involvement under NEPA.) <br /> • The project does not adversely impact on-site endangered species <br /> ' • The project does not affect natural springs, fens, or Sombrero Marsh in Colorado <br /> If these criteria are met, a good strategy is to request a pre-application consultation with a <br /> representative of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with jurisdiction in the region to review <br /> the project. The Corps of Engineers Tri-lake Project office would be the initial contact. If it <br /> appears that the project is exempt from Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act, we <br /> Irecommend providing some basic project information to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> and requesting a letter from the local office confirming this fact. <br /> GEI Consultants, Inc. 3-7 01002 Dec 2001 Lower South Platte River Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.