Laserfiche WebLink
Lower South Platte River Study <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> ' December 2001 <br /> ' The analysis completed to date indicates that a potential water storage project can <br /> operate effectively under the above constraints, and depending on the specific uses of <br /> the facility, may have little to no ESA mitigation issues. To fully document project <br /> feasibility, the topics outlined here may need to be evaluated in greater detail. <br /> ' Even though it is likely that a proposed project would be completed during the first <br /> increment of the proposed program, a brief description of how projects are handled <br /> during the CA is provided below. <br /> Under the CA, a water-related activity(requiring a federal action) with depletion <br /> greater than 25 acre-feet will require replacing the consumptive use below the <br /> ' diversion point within the state in which the depletion occurs. Replacement is to <br /> occur outside of the irrigation season and at a time of shortage for the species. <br /> ' The USFWS also will be concerned about the impacts on wildlife, fishery, and <br /> botanical resources and will require that a Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act <br /> ' (FWCA) report be prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife to <br /> address other terrestrial and aquatic wildlife and habitat issues. <br /> ' In addition to USFWS and CA issues, other federal agencies may be involved in <br /> permitting: <br /> ' • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Clean Water Act: The <br /> EPA has the power to veto any water project permit issued under the Clean Water <br /> Act. The EPA is generally concerned that the applicant demonstrates an adequate <br /> purpose and need for the project and focuses on water quality and wetlands issues. <br /> ' • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and 404 Permits: Under Section 404 <br /> of the Clean Water Act, a permit from the COE is required whenever material is <br /> dredged or filled in the waters of the United States. Any construction in jurisdictional <br /> wetlands or below the ordinary high waterline of a stream or reservoir is generally <br /> considered an impact to the waters of the United States. As a result, this law <br /> ' generally impacts the construction of new dams and modification of existing dams. <br /> As part of this reconnaissance-level study, a preliminary wetlands assessment was <br /> performed, as described in Section 5.5. <br /> An alternative to the individual permit is to utilize an existing nationwide permit that <br /> ' has already been documented by NEPA. Sometimes modification of an existing dam <br /> can be designed to minimize impacts below the ordinary high waterline of the <br /> existing reservoir or riverbank so that the construction qualifies under an existing <br /> ' nationwide permit. In this case, a letter from the COE confirming that the project <br /> GEI Consultants, Inc. 3-5 01002 Dec 2001 Lower South Platte River Study <br />