Laserfiche WebLink
Replace "showing" with "demonstrating". (NCWCD, CSU) <br /> b Water court application should be adequate for Board to determine whether the amount of <br /> water claimed is minimum amount necessary. No additional information should be required. <br /> (NWCCOG-QQ) <br /> RICD r ,z.. <br /> 1* The Staff recommends striking this language, as suggested below. <br /> * Delete Rule 8(h). It may be inappropriate to have an RICD in a Recreation Class 2 <br /> waterbody, but the Water Quality Control Commission does deteimine classifications based <br /> on actual use, as compared to use being based on classification. This is clearly a public policy <br /> issue. However, is it one for the Board to decide? If the water quality is not "good enough" to <br /> support full body immersion, should the RICD be denied?That public policy choice may be <br /> best made by Local Governmental Entity contemplating the RICD. (NCWCD, CSU) <br /> b Water quality is not within scope of SB 216b or the Board's authority or expertise and is not <br /> relevant to the water court's decision to grant or deny the RICD. (NWCCOG-QQ) <br /> i. Information about all necessary permits and the status thereof includinui existing or <br /> proposed permit terms and conditions; <br /> 1* The Staff recommends the language change suggested below for clarification, but otherwise <br /> recommends keeping this request for information. <br /> Modify by adding "including existing or proposed permit terms and conditions". May be <br /> more useful to know what terms and conditions may be imposed as compared to simply what <br /> peimuts are necessary and stage applicant is at in the permitting process. (NCWCD,CSU) <br /> b It is not clear how information regarding other permits will assist the Board in making a <br /> recommendation to the water court. (NWCCOG-QQ) <br /> j. List of persons notified by the Applicant about the RICD; <br /> k. Documentation of tie effects-that the RICD and the associated-stntctures-will have-on <br /> flooding,flood control and the one-hundred year flood elevations; and, <br /> 1. Information about existing or proposed gages on the affected stream necessary <br /> capable of to-administering the water right being sought. <br /> The Staff recommends this language change for clarification, but otherwise recommends <br /> keeping this request for information. Not all gages are administered by the State Engineer. <br /> Modify by changing "necessary" to "designed". Applicant should not be determining what <br /> gages are "necessary". (NCWCD, CSU) <br /> This consideration is not relevant to the Board's determination as existing and proposed <br /> gages will be administered by the State Engineer's Office. (NWCCOG-QQ) <br /> ---9-.$,N MICE <br /> ------- — — ---- — ----- <br /> Within seven days of the Application Receipt Date, the Staff shall post notice of receipt of the <br /> application on the CWCB website. The notice shall include the name of the Applicant, the <br /> flow amounts claimed, the water division, the name of the stream, the location of the <br /> • structures including the cGounty, and information about how to obtain party status. In <br /> 19 <br />