Laserfiche WebLink
4_East Fork—Private Land ✓ Agreement consensus not to support WSR <br /> eligibility. <br /> 5_Both Segments, Watershed (as A view represented is to consider the idea of <br /> of 1/25/11 these have only been discussed establishing some type of"district" that encompasses <br /> to the East Fork as well) the public and private lands in the watershed. This <br /> "district" would serve as an alternative to the WSR <br /> status(eligibility, suitability or full status), and would <br /> provide a mechanism to review projects/activities in <br /> the watershed that would/could harm the values. It <br /> was agreed that,for this idea to move forward the <br /> following has to occur: <br /> • The USFS has to agree to it. <br /> • Affected landowners must support it and buy <br /> in, or it will not move forward. <br /> • Another group must be willing to take it on <br /> (The San Juan River Workgroup would be the <br /> group to broadly suggest this recommendation. <br /> However, a smaller group committed to the <br /> idea would have to "take it and run with it.") <br /> • The county(ies) must be involved. <br /> Another view represented is to consider the idea of a <br /> deed restriction on private lands(voluntary and done <br /> by the landowners) that would protect the ORVs and <br /> would be done in exchange for the USFS removing the <br /> possibility of WSR. <br /> 6_Both Segments - Private ✓ There was consensus that,whatever is done, the <br /> Lands landowners should be engaged, involved and in <br /> agreement with it. (Note:This principle applies to <br /> the ideas discussed in other sections.) <br /> 7_Both Segments, Watershed ✓ Consensus to set up a Local Advisepi-Council to <br /> encourage local discussions and action related to <br /> protection of the values. The Council will be set <br /> up in such a way so as not to violate any federal <br /> laws (FACA specifically). advise the USFS on <br /> protection of the values (Please refer to the <br /> c r` <br /> document the sub committee created.) <br /> co <br /> o � <br /> LL <br /> it <br /> o Council could be structured. <br /> ✓ c Q 8_Both Segments, Watershed In January 2011, the Working Group determined the <br /> 0 <br /> cc following list of options related to a mineral with-drawl <br /> (N (7, uo after receiving more information. It was agreed that <br /> • v o more discussion is needed on this item. <br />