Glenwood Springs Field Office Recreation Appendix Working Draft

Home Browse Search

Working Draft—GSFO Recreation Appendix- 3-6-2009 King Mountain Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) (Alternative B) RMZ Outcome Objective The outcome objective identifies the specific recreation activities to be emphasized, the outcomes(experiences and benefits)to be produced/realized as well as the desired customer assessment standard to be monitored and achieved. Participants in visitor assessments report an average 4.0 realization of the targeted experience and benefit outcomes listed below. (4.0 on a probability scale where: 1 = Not at all realized to 5=totally realized). Activities Experiences Benefits Personal: • Hunting by • Enjoying the area's • Improved opportunity to view wildlife up close Horseback wildlife, scenery, • Closer relationship with the natural world (Scouting) views&aesthetics • Greater understanding of the importance of wildlife to my • Viewing • To experience the quality of life Wildlife natural surroundings • Developing stronger ties with my family and friends • Camping • Enjoying the • To be with others who enjoy the same things I do closeness of • Living a more outdoor-oriented lifestyle family/friends Community/Social: • For the challenge or • Strengthing relationships with family and friends sport Environmental: • Greater protection of fish,wildlife,and plant habitat from growth, development and public use impacts • Increased awareness and protection of natural landscapes • Maintenance/preservation of dinstinctive public land recreation setting character Economic: • Maintain local tourism revenue Proposed Recreation Setting Character Conditions (RSCCs) RSCCs depict the desired future recreational qualities of the landscape(physical), the qualities associated with use(social), and the conditions created by management(operational);that influence the kinds of recreation activities that are offered and recreation outcomes produced/realized. Proposed Physical RSCCs Remoteness:The current remoteness from motorized vehicles exists. Naturalness:The existing natural landscape is retained. Any new non-recreational modifications(e.g. ROWs, fences, ponds)are not visually obvious or evident. Visitor Facilities:Simple/basic recreation developments at trailheads along with maintained/signed trails are found on-site. Proposed Social RSCCs Contacts(ava): Participants encounter a season average 4-6 encounters/day. Group Size(avg.): Participants encounter a season average 6-8 people per group. Sounds of other people infrequently heard. A few small localized areas of vegetation Evidence of Use: So p p q y 9 alteration and compacted/bare soils are found near trailheads and at campsites. Inappropriate recreation use is rehabilitated. Proposed Operational RSCCs Access(types of travel):All public recreational access is non-motorized. Visitor Services/Info: A simple brochure/map assists visitors. Minimum directional signage is installed on routes. Rules, regulations and ethics clearly posted at trailheads. Management Controls:A moderate degree of visitor and land use controls exercised. BLM on-site presence is low away from trailheads. Page I 35