Laserfiche WebLink
Working Draft—GSFO Recreation Appendix- 3-6-2009 <br /> Hack Lake Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) <br /> (Alternative B) <br /> RMZ Outcome Objective <br /> The outcome objective identifies the specific recreation activities to be emphasized, the outcomes(experiences <br /> and benefits) to be produced/realized as well as the desired customer assessment standard to be monitored <br /> and achieved. <br /> Participants in visitor assessments report an average 4.0 realization of the targeted experience and benefit <br /> outcomes listed below. (4.0 on a probability scale where: 1 = Not at all realized to 5=totally realized). <br /> Activities Experiences Benefits <br /> Personal: <br /> • Hiking • Enjoying the solitude • Developing stronger ties with my family or friends <br /> • Horseback • Escaping everyday • Improved physical fitness and health maintenance <br /> Riding responsibilities for a • Improved mental well-being <br /> • Hunting while •Greater environmental awareness and sensitivity <br /> • Camping • Releasing or reducing <br /> some built-up mental Community/Social: <br /> tensions • Strengthing relationships with family and friends <br /> • Getting some needed <br /> physical exercise Environmental: <br /> • Enjoying the area's • Increased awareness and protection of natural landscapes <br /> wildlife, scenery,views <br /> and aesthetics. Economic: <br /> •Increased desirability as a place to live or retire <br /> • Maintain local tourism revenue <br /> Proposed Recreation Setting Character Conditions (RSCCs) <br /> RSCCs depict the desired future recreational qualities of the landscape(physical), the qualities associated with <br /> use(social), and the conditions created by management(operational);that influence the kinds of recreation <br /> activities that are offered and recreation outcomes produced/realized. <br /> Proposed Physical RSCCs <br /> Remoteness:The current remoteness from motorized vehicles exists. <br /> Naturalness:The existing natural landscape is retained. Any new, non-recreational modifications(e.g. ROWs, <br /> fences, ponds)are not visually obvious or evident. <br /> Visitor Facilities:Simple/basic recreation developments at trailheads along with maintained/signed trails are <br /> found on-site. <br /> Proposed Social RSCCs <br /> Contacts(avg.): Participants encounter a season average 4-6 encounters/day. <br /> Group Size(avq.):Participants encounter a season average 6-8 people per group. <br /> Evidence of Use: Sounds of other people rarely heard. A few small localized areas of vegetation alteration and <br /> compacted/bare soils are acceptable near the trailhead and at campsites. Inappropriate recreation use is <br /> rehabilitated. <br /> Proposed Operational RSCCs <br /> Access(types of travel):All public recreational access is non-motorized/mechanized. <br /> Visitor Services/Info: A simple brochure/map assists visitors. Minimum directional signage is installed on <br /> routes. Rules, regulations and ethics clearly posted at trailheads. <br /> Management Controls:A moderate degree of visitor and land use controls exercised. BLM on-site presence is <br /> low away from trailheads. <br /> Page 124 <br />