Laserfiche WebLink
What uses have been authorized since 1996? Future use authorizations in planning stage <br /> • Reconstruction/cnlargcnlcnr ot • Reconstruction of(.> r°pipeline <br /> ditch(. C. sanda l)ueh . ,601111(W; }t, intake area <br /> • (soil truction otVAat.t con A(\1Ilia <br /> • ReconstrtCCfion of diA Utiri)tls to <br /> pipe link under ricer e g.Ni.silt tacthtate boat fish pa. ,vie <br /> r t' ;! • S ilc ul propca•ttrs con\(ra•d to - -.. �' °'i • (onunucd rtde\eloprnent of <br /> 4'47:le '6 t ;441t, municipal water supply to I31,AI- ry recreation sacs <br /> c.g. .Aurora's I III(IC.it Ranch `` - ' • Pump start( tilt ncvv rc'scrvous <br /> • Major d,cirCe transmission line t -cg.,Aurora's Ros Crc(k Res. <br /> +ep ► . <br /> upgrade.-c g.\\t:\P.\ • In Channel fish habitat <br /> • Bank stabilization and Ill vv° improvcnit nu, <br /> t•Ctctltlon\calls-c.g.(.t)(.)I <br /> • Pill ate drive\vacs and bridges <br /> Arkansas River Case Study: Dolores River 1976 Suitability Determination <br /> Conclusion=; Results <br /> • 131:1I's sutrlblc"dctuminatum didn't prcchuic <br /> cooperation btuvItn tells,state,and local stal(holders <br /> to address land management and vyatcr management ,� .., „,, <br /> ;,,,tics <br /> ■ .A locally-drn cn approach is able to address <br /> controversial tlovv manage nu tat and land management - ,..� ..,,, <br /> t sues. <br /> • C i nil current mm�agon nt.there scans to be little - <br /> Interest in ch sii,inating the-Arkansas into the National <br /> \\'ild and Scenic Ricers Svstenl. - - <br /> Key Points from 1976 Suitability Study: Key Points from 1976 Suitability Study:. <br /> • Congressionally mandated study-. • McPhee 1)am to confluence ix ith San Miguel River: <br /> •Joint federal-state effort involving f L.S.Dept.of II Suitable. (>RV's=scenic_geolog).archacologv,cultural <br /> Interior.I_U.S.forest Service.and Colorado A\ater ■D,cwnented vvildlth values included tlannclmouth sucker, <br /> Conservation Board roundtail chub(page il). <br /> ■-I),c clo tnent of the Dolores ProjCet,vaith provislons ot <br /> •I ` I he Dolores Project is compatible\N tit designation p r <br /> CC,IT flo\v from\Ic]hcc 1)a111,\\ill re.store the fishery <br /> of the Dolores as a component of the Aational\V`ild along the scfnnenc" <br /> and Scenic Rivers S\stem. The McPhee Dam will <br /> •I lannelrnouth sucker and rounchail chub were not scnsitivc <br /> i enhance and complement such desilgnation."(Pale 98) <br /> spears in 1076. <br /> 5 <br />