My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CT2015-171 Attorney Opinion Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
CT2015-171 Attorney Opinion Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 11:08:50 AM
Creation date
6/19/2015 11:08:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
CT2015-171
Contractor Name
Lower Poudre Augmentation Company
Contract Type
Loan
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FISCHER . BROWN, BARTLETT & GUNN, PC <br /> WARD H.FISCHER(1929-1996) <br /> WILLIAM R.FISCHER WILLIAM H.BROWN(Of Counsel) <br /> MARGARET A.(Meg)BROWN WILLIAM C.GUNN (Of Counsel) <br /> DANIEL K.BROWN <br /> BRENT A.BARTLETT ATTORNEYS AT LAW Phone:970.407.9000 <br /> LISA A.LARSEN Fax:970.407.1055 <br /> SARA J.L.IRBY 1319 East Prospect Road E-mail:fbg @fbgpc.com <br /> DONALD E.FRICK Fort Collins,CO 80525 I!ebsite:www.fbbglaw.com <br /> June 11, 2015 <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Authority of the Lower Poudre Augmentation Company to enter into Loan Contract(CMS: <br /> 79702/CORE:CT 2015-171)with the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> To Whom It May Concern: <br /> This opinion is being delivered to you pursuant to Paragraph 7 of the Loan Contract <br /> (CMS: 79702/CORE:CT 2015-171)between the Lower Poudre Augmentation Company <br /> ("Borrower")and the Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB"). I have reviewed <br /> Borrower's articles of incorporation and bylaws, the minutes of the board meeting at which this <br /> Loan Contract was considered and approved, and the contract itself. Based upon the <br /> representations of the Borrower and the documents provided as described above, I am of the <br /> opinion that: <br /> 1. The contract has been duly executed by officers of the Borrower who are duly elected <br /> or appointed and are authorized to execute the contract and to bind the Borrower; <br /> 2. The minutes of the Borrower authorizing the execution and delivery of the contract <br /> show that the board duly authorized the execution and delivery of the Loan Contract <br /> by the Borrower; <br /> 3. It is my opinion that there are no provisions in the Borrower's articles of <br /> incorporation or bylaws or any state or local law that prevent this contract from <br /> binding the Borrower and that the contract will be valid and binding against the <br /> Borrower if entered into by the CWCB. <br /> Accordingly, it is my opinion that Borrower has adequate authority to enter into the <br /> contract through resolution adopted by the Borrower evidenced by Borrower's minutes. <br /> Sincerely; <br /> Daniel K. Brown,Esq. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.