My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150240 Vegitation Montioring Analysis
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
C150240 Vegitation Montioring Analysis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2015 2:10:33 PM
Creation date
3/2/2015 9:05:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150240
Contractor Name
Bull Creek Reservoir, Canal & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Mesa
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I-' <br /> Results <br /> There was no significant change detected between the percent cover, species richness and species I <br /> diversity within the various elevations (zones) or sites during the monitoring period (P-value > <br /> 0.05). <br /> I <br /> Although there was no statistically significant change (P-value < 0.05) detected, one potential <br /> trend may be present. Species richness may have decreased over the monitoring period (R2 = <br /> I <br /> 0.70, P = 0.16). This trend has a weak linear relationship (R2 > 0.6, P-value < 0.25) and could be <br /> explained by a number of reasons. Natural variation, varying quadrat placements, human error, <br /> fluctuating growing season dates, timing of drawdown of water levels, differing precipitation, and <br /> I <br /> grazing presence explain species with a relatively small percentage of cover possibly not being <br /> detected from year to year. <br /> Percent cover for selected vegetation groups for each year in the newly inundated zone is I <br /> displayed in Table 4 and Graph 1. <br /> Table. 4. Percent cover for selected vegetation groups and wetland indicator status in the newly I <br /> inundated zone for the monitoring period. <br /> Carex Graminoids Forb Willow Herbaceous OBL t <br /> Year 0 0 0 o Understory Species <br /> (/o cover) (/o cover) (/o cover) (/o cover) 0 �' (%p <br /> (/0 cover) (/o cover) I <br /> 2010 48.6 9.1 32.4 45.2 87.6 77.8 <br /> 2011 42.5 2.3 4.6 23.2 32.2 63.4 <br /> 2012 46.3 8.9 16.8 21.2 60.3 66.9 I <br /> 2014 55.1 7.3 2.8 28.8 42 82.2 <br /> I <br /> 100 <br /> Percent Cover During Monitoring Period -4•,-Carex <br /> ` 90 <br /> I <br /> 80 .� - -Graminoids <br /> d 70 <br /> U 60 -l-Forb <br /> t. 50 <br /> -E I <br /> { u 40 -Willow <br /> 4 20 ___- CIE-Herbaceous I <br /> 10 - ■ Understory <br /> — -411-OBL <br /> 0 -T - 1 Species <br /> 2010 2011 2012 2014 <br /> I <br /> Graph 1. Percent cover for selected vegetation groups and wetland indicator status in the <br /> newly inundated zone for the monitoring period. <br /> I <br /> WestWater Engineering Page 7 of 14 February 2015 I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.