My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP SPWRAP Meeting Documents October 23, 2014
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
PRRIP SPWRAP Meeting Documents October 23, 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 3:40:24 PM
Creation date
2/10/2015 3:24:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SPWRAP Documents for the October 23, 2014 meeting held in Denver, CO. Includes Legal memorandum summarizing Board Actions and Other legal issues, and the PRRIP and SPWRAP summary and annual report
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/23/2014
Author
SPWRAP
Title
PRRIP SPWRAP Meeting Documents October 23, 2014
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Why the Platte River Program is Needed by Colorado <br /> The Platte River Program is designed to resolve conflicts between water use and <br /> endangered species protection in the Platte River basin. Resolution of these conflicts is critical <br /> to the continued use and development of water supplies to meet the needs of Colorado's South <br /> Platte Basin. <br /> The Conflict <br /> Water-related projects that are authorized, funded, or carried out by a federal agency <br /> may require consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under the Endangered <br /> Species Act (ESA). Federal agencies are required by Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA to insure that <br /> those actions are not likely to jeopardize listed species or adversely modify their designated <br /> critical habitat. Construction, operation and maintenance of water projects in the Platte River <br /> basin routinely require a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers. This <br /> includes routine projects such as pipeline crossings of jurisdictional waters and repair or <br /> rehabilitation of conveyance structures, which activities are frequently covered by nationwide <br /> permits. Many water storage or conveyance facilities located on national forest lands require <br /> special use permits issued by the U.S. Forest Service. Federal action may also be present <br /> through the receipt of federal funding under certain agricultural assistance programs. The <br /> Bureau of Reclamation and Corps of Engineers also own major water collection, distribution <br /> and storage facilities that provide water to numerous ditch companies and municipalities or are <br /> used for flood control purposes in Colorado. These types of activities are all subject to Section <br /> 7 of the ESA. <br /> The FWS believes that the Platte River resource is in a state of jeopardy, and that actions <br /> resulting in water depletions to the Platte River will continue the deterioration of the <br /> endangered species' habitat. The federally listed species at issue include the whooping crane, <br /> interior least tern, piping plover and pallid sturgeon. Prior to the Program, the FWS issued <br /> "jeopardy" biological opinions for virtually all water-depletive projects in the Platte River basin <br /> starting in the late 1970s, citing either new or continued water depletions as contributing <br /> factors in jeopardizing the existence of these species and adversely affecting designated critical <br /> habitat. Notable examples include the biological opinions issued in 1994 for the renewal of <br /> Forest Service special use authorizations for six existing agricultural and municipal water <br /> facilities along Colorado's Front Range. The 1994 opinions concluded that, absent offsetting <br /> measures, each of those existing water facilities would cause jeopardy to the listed species and <br /> adversely modify Platte River designated critical habitat in central Nebraska. The average <br /> annual depletions associated with one of those long-standing projects was 0.64 acre feet. <br /> Under the jeopardy standard applied by the FWS, individual water projects undergoing <br /> ESA consultation must avoid or fully offset all project depletions to FWS instream flow <br /> 2 <br /> SPWRAP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.