C150206 Time Extention Request - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

berianb 311)ittb anb 3.eorboir Qtampanp grand mesa. Our experience of now more than 7 years into the process suggests this is a good first move. • Current Activity and Plan: Several meetings with the COE have been completed with staff, engineering, and environmental science to date. It is anticipated that a full year, perhaps a year and a half will be required to complete the COE permit process, the public comment periods and the response documentation. It is anticipated that there will be opposition to the project from several sources. Current plan: 2011 COE 404 permit—public comment—scoping Environmental studies Quantitative wetlands evaluation 2012 COE Final permit stage USFS NEPA and special use permit requirements (roads, timber, etc) Engineering/Contract work 2013 Final permits sometime in 2013 Final Engineering drawings Pre Contract Bid Spring START CONSTRUCTION FALL 2013 FINISH CONSTRUCTION LATE FALL 2013 Environmental Studies;The COE 404 process is very complex and requires heavy emphasis on wetlands management and analysis. The FENS issues prevalent on the Grand Mesa are poorly understood and lacking in well performed scientific studies. The FENS impact area on our project is about.08 acres (3000 square feet)and is very small and our preliminary study suggests that impacts will be small, if any to the existing FENS. For this reason, the team feels there is a good chance at an ultimate permit. We anticipate environmental analysis costs to be in the range of$75,000 to$150,000 and will be the major expense in the permitting process. The suggestion is that an EA(Environmental Analysis)will be sufficient. A requirement for an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement)would be of such cost that the project would most likely be unfeasible.We should know by the end of 2011 what those requirements will be. Engineering and Construction: This project has already had a significant amount of engineering and preliminary work completed. The Overland is a mature site with existing roads, infrastructure, borrow pit, and a relatively easy engineering requirement. The outlet works will not be disturbed. The spillway will require minor modifications but no significant rebuild. A large component of cost may be the LEDPA (Least Environmentally Damaging Proposed Alternatives)analysis. The 404/NEPA requirements require looking at all possible alternatives for expansion, and in some cases doing in-depth evaluations of those sites. By the end of 2011 we should have some idea of the requirements in this area. I think the Engineering and Construction permitting and planning phase of this project will move very quickly once the environmental hurdles are completed. Money Requirements: It remains unclear what the final cost requirements will be for this project. Current projections remain in the$1.8 million dollar range which at$1800 per AF stored remains very cheap supply water. This project is being driven by environmental analysis costs. At the 2011 shareholders meeting of the Overland Ditch, the shareholders by a wide margin voted to continue support of the project as outlined. By 1Q 2012 we should have better numbers. The company will be drawing against the loan in the near future as we are starting a number of studies this summer. The company plans on resubmitting to the roundtable for a follow up grant on the FENS study published that has had good reception. The FENS wetlands issue is the defining obstacle to supply projects on GM at the moment. (As a side comment I think the CWCB would be wise in supporting some further research on the wetlands issues on the GM. I have some projects in mind!) Page 2