My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Draft PRRIP GC Minutes June 2014
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Draft PRRIP GC Minutes June 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 10:16:53 AM
Creation date
1/14/2015 8:45:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Draft PRRIP Governance Committee Minutes June 2014
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
North Platte
South Platte
Date
6/13/2014
Author
PRRIP ED Office
Title
Draft PRRIP GC Minutes June 2014
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PRRIP—ED OFFICE DRAFT 06/13/2014 <br /> 137 Kearney Canal <br /> 138 Farnsworth introduced the Kearney Canal sedimentation analysis report. Werbylo provided a <br /> 139 presentation on the report. Kraus asked about the concentration of sediment between years. Werbylo said <br /> 140 the concentration relationship was not reported. <br /> 141 <br /> 142 J2 Reservoir Update <br /> 143 Kraus and Drain provided an update on the status of the J2 project. Kraus said all initial contributions <br /> 144 were done on time and according to schedule. Drain said financial reporting is required on an annual <br /> 145 basis but future quarterly reports could include some of that detail. Ament asked about the water rights <br /> 146 petition filing. Drain said they believe they are adding more regulation to existing facilities and not <br /> 147 changing the amount or date of diversion. The Nebraska DNR has to be petitioned for approval. The <br /> 148 Central Platte NRD does have instream flows in the 3-mile section of river that will be bypassed so there <br /> 149 has been consultation with the Central Platte NRD. Ament asked if they were amenable. Drain said yes, <br /> 150 there was a question about reporting and measurement of the amount of flow that is bypassed with annual <br /> 151 reporting. Czaplewski said that is just to track it over time. LaBonde asked if there was any discussion of <br /> 152 when a decision would be made on the petition. Drain said no. Schneider said he does not know either <br /> 153 but it is being processed. Kenny said there is a lot of work going on but most of that is through <br /> 154 consultants. Of the $20 million set aside, most of that remains intact until land acquisition gets into full <br /> 155 swing. Kraus said he is going to track down what is in the Program account and what has been expended <br /> 156 through June 1. Kraus said there is not a need to send another invoice right now. Schneider said <br /> 157 technically the Program would not have to make another payment for three years. The Nebraska DNR is <br /> 158 budgeting for this similar to the Program but wonders if an amendment to the agreement is required to <br /> 159 start making payments more quickly. Kenny asked if getting an invoice this year would be a benefit. <br /> 160 Schneider said it is not critical but could be helpful. Campbell said having a yearly statement will help <br /> 161 the cause and spending in chunks would be beneficial. Schneider said Nebraska can stage its money <br /> 162 through the NCF if necessary. Kenny said he will discuss this further with the Department of the Interior <br /> 163 and CNPPID and will have a recommendation at the September 2014 GC meeting. <br /> 164 <br /> 165 Campbell asked about the footprint of the darn and whether impounding more water will result in more <br /> 166 water in the account. Drain said he was not sure on exact yield levels but that the initial design was about <br /> 167 12,000 acre-feet and the adjusted design is about 15,000 acre-feet. There may be more opportunity for <br /> 168 storage but the final footprint and modifications to the design are not yet final. LaBonde said we will not <br /> 169 know until there is a final design report. From his perspective, he would be interested in optimizing <br /> 170 storage if it is available so he requested keeping the GC apprised of these potential design changes. <br /> 171 Sellers noted that the J2 project does have a few sentences on an annual report in Section 6 and she is <br /> 172 assuming that is part of the annual report that Campbell referenced. Drain said yes. <br /> 173 <br /> 174 Independent Scientific Advisory Committee(ISAC) <br /> 175 Marmorek provided a presentation on the ISAC report that resulted from the April 2014 ISAC meeting in <br /> 176 Omaha. Kraus asked what kind of nesting islands the ISAC was recommending be constructed in the <br /> 177 channel. Marmorek said islands that have been created but some that would persist even at the highest <br /> 178 flows. Czaplewski expressed concern that approach had been tried before but had not yielded positive <br /> 179 long-term results. Marmorek said the effort to build islands on the Platte should be linked to analyses of <br /> 180 other river systems and what is different between the Platte and those systems. Czaplewski said there has <br /> 181 been a variety of islands built on the Platte and nesting islands on other rivers like the Niobrara are much <br /> 182 different than what we see on the Platte. Kraus asked if the discharge slide for the Niobrara would look <br /> 183 like the one Marmorek showed for the Platte. Farnsworth said on average Platte peaks are in June, on <br /> PRRIP June 10.11,2014 GC Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.