Board Meeting 09/13/1984 J. William Mcdonald Director and Secretary

Home Browse Search

Mr. Mike Acimovic January 25, 1984 Page two (a). Between the project proposed in the feasibility study .and the project built, there are the following points of similarity: • Top height of dam Same within .1 foot Crest of spillway Same within 1 foot Length of new 'embankment Same (Sta 10 + 00 to 35 + 00) Length of toe drain Same (within feet) Clearing of trees and growth Same Seeding and mulching of dam Same • Spillway Same place and same length Same riprapped channel Difference only in type of crest Outlet Works Same - plug 1 outlet Renovate the other outlet with new gates & outlet basin Embankment Riprap Same (b) The only point of difference between the rehabilitation and enlargement alternate evaluated in the feasibility study and the project as built is that the embankment was placed upon the upstream face with the ZSA plan rather than upon the downstream face and a stability berm was placed on the downstream toe of the existing embankment. Also, the chimney drain called for in the feasibility study by Water Resource Consultants on the downstream slope was not constructed with the ZSA plan. Because of these findings, I conclude that the project as built was the same as the rehabilitation and enlargement alternate investi- gated in the feasibility study. The changes which were made were changes which one would normally expect during final design. There- fore, the Henry Waneka Mutual Reservoir Company is hereby requested to make annual payments of $1,020.24 per year for ten years pursuant to the contract signed between the company and the State of Colorado (Colorado Water Conservation Board) .