Laserfiche WebLink
392 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 55 <br /> reached completion and will argue that the Colorado framework has <br /> been successful in assuring that Colorado's water resources are care- <br /> fully used. <br /> It is fair to say that, in some respects, the discussion about plans <br /> and studies is simply a touchstone for looking at the state's role in <br /> the utilization of Colorado's water resources — what has that role <br /> been and should it change. <br /> And, while this article emphasizes Colorado, it is suspected <br /> that, with the exception perhaps of California, most western states <br /> have had similar experiences, primarily because the projects that <br /> could not be paid for by the consumer were planned, built, financed <br /> and, in large part, paid for by the federal government. <br /> I. THE PRE-1970 SETTING FOR UTILIZING COLORADO'S <br /> WATER <br /> A. State Water Plans and Studies <br /> As late as 1935, the State Engineer's office was the only Colo- <br /> rado agency supervising the state's water resources.' The legislature <br /> granted the State Engineer little authority or money to engage in <br /> water resource planning and study. Legislation directed the State <br /> Engineer to carefully measure water flows, collect data and informa- <br /> tion about dams and reservoirs"hereafter to be constructed, and like <br /> data regarding the feasibility and economical construction of reser- <br /> voirs on eligible sites . . . and the useful purposes to which the water <br /> from same may be put."2 He was also directed to obtain and record <br /> "all available data pertaining to the water supply of this state"3 and <br /> the legislature appropriated $10,000 annually for the time period <br /> necessary to gather this data.° Several small state canals and reser- <br /> voirs were authorized and some were constructed.° Legislation also <br /> authorized investigations of river systems for use in compact negotia- <br /> tions and interstate litigation.° From any perspective, the state's <br /> commitment to planning and study before 1935 was modest and di- <br /> rected toward specific activities. <br /> In 1937, the legislature established a new agency, the Colorado <br /> Water Conservation Board, and authorized it "to devise and formu- <br /> 1. 1935 Coto. STAT. ANN., ch. 90, art. 10. <br /> 2. Id. at ch. 90, § 203. <br /> 3. Id. at ch. 90, § 204. <br /> 4. Id. at ch. 90, § 205. <br /> 5. Id. at ch. 90, art. 14. <br /> 6. Id. at ch. 90, art. 3. <br />