My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2014 2:36:04 PM
Creation date
11/28/2014 2:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Description
Plans and Studies: The Recent Quest for a Utopia in the Utilization of Colorado's Water Resources
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1984] COLORADO'S WATER RESOURCES 417 <br /> changing circumstances. A dramatic overhaul in state water-related <br /> institutions is probably not justified or needed. In fact, given our en- <br /> trepreneurial water system, it may not be desirable. Furthermore, <br /> any change in our appropriation doctrine, which is the heart and soul <br /> of our entrepreneurial system, would require an amendment to Colo- <br /> rado's Constitution and thus would affect and concern almost all our <br /> citizens. <br /> Our state structures are not perfect, but they do work and, as a <br /> result, have redirected policy in recent years, and set the course for <br /> the future. <br /> V. SOME STRENGTHS, SOME WEAKNESSES, AND SOME PROS- <br /> PECTS FOR COLORADO'S WATER RESOURCES <br /> It must by now be apparent that no single plan or study will <br /> show the way for perfectly utilizing Colorado's water resources. The <br /> quest will continue. As new events intrude on the utilization of Colo- <br /> rado water, there will always be some royal melancholy. Should all <br /> this change? Should new, powerful agencies, backed by special taxes <br /> or the state's credit be established? I doubt it. The great possibilities <br /> of the thirties, forties and fifties are behind us. Restraints have been <br /> imposed. Future plans for water development must respond to the <br /> realities of need, coupled with capital, restrained by a separate need <br /> for environmental protection. Colorado will likely benefit in the long <br /> run from such "selective planning." The best planning for the future <br /> can come when specific needs require projects reasonably calculated <br /> to accomplish those needs. Then, special attention can be given by <br /> state or regional agencies to seeing the project through. <br /> The proposal of a super agency appeals to no one. The proposal <br /> of a super plan is almost impossible to achieve. The complexities are <br /> too great, the misunderstandings and rapidly changing circumstances <br /> too likely. It becomes more and more evident that the plans and <br /> studies of the seventies were efforts to catch up with what had al- <br /> ready happened or what was simultaneously happening. <br /> Colorado's plan for its water resources was put in the Constitu- <br /> tion more than one hundred years ago.168 It has evolved by accom- <br /> modating conditional decrees,180 extensive ground water use,'61 <br /> transfers, minimum stream flows1ea and substantial injections of fed- <br /> ` 159. COLD. CONST., art XIV, §§ 5, 6. <br /> 160. See supra note 31. <br /> 161. CoLo. REV. STAT. § 37-92-102; §§ 37-90-101 to 141(1973). <br /> 162. See supra notes 102-104. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.