My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2014 2:36:04 PM
Creation date
11/28/2014 2:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Description
Plans and Studies: The Recent Quest for a Utopia in the Utilization of Colorado's Water Resources
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
408 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 55 <br /> appropriation to be made; that there is a natural environment <br /> that can be preserved to a reasonable degree with the board's <br /> water right if granted; and that such environment can exist <br /> without material injury to water rights.10e <br /> 2. Endangered species legislation <br /> Also in 1973, the legislature directed the wildlife commission to <br /> establish a list of "wildlife indigenous to this state which are deter- <br /> mined to be endangered within this state."108 The division may ac- <br /> quire land and aquatic habitat necessary for management of non- <br /> game and endangered wildlife.107 In 1977, after extensive debate, a <br /> checkoff was approved for the state income tax return which allows <br /> contributions to be made to the non-game wildlife program.108 The <br /> Department of Natural Resources, on the recommendation of the <br /> Natural Areas Council, may "identify and protect certain natural <br /> areas which . . . provide habitat for rare or endangered animal or <br /> plant species. . . ."109 Natural area designations are contigent on <br /> permission of the landowner.'" <br /> 3. Water Quality Control <br /> Colorado has roughly paralleled federal legislation on water <br /> quality control. Colorado's law calls for preventing "injury to benefi- <br /> cial uses made of state waters, to maximize the beneficial uses of <br /> water, and to develop water to which Colorado and its citizens are <br /> entitled and, within this context, to achieve the maximum practical <br /> degree of water quality."111 <br /> Colorado's water quality law must be construed "to require . . . <br /> a water quality program in which . . . benefits of the pollution con- <br /> 105. COLO. REV. STAT. § 37-92-102(3)(c) (Supp. 1983). <br /> 106. Id. §§33-8-105.In 1977 the legislature amended this provision to provide that the <br /> Commission establish a list of"wildlife indigenous to this state which are determined to be <br /> endangered or threatened within this state."Id. (emphasis added). <br /> An "endangered species" was defined as: "any species or subspecies of wildlife <br /> whose propects of survival or recruitment within this state are in jeopardy as deter- <br /> mined by the commission."A"threatened species" was defined as: "any species or <br /> subspecies of wildlife which is not in immediate jeopardy of extinction but is vulner- <br /> able because it exists in such small numbers or is so extremely restricted throughout <br /> all or a significant portion of its range that it may become endangered." <br /> CoLo. REV. STAT. § 33-8-103(4), (8) (1973). <br /> 107. Id. § 33-8-106 (Supp 1983). <br /> 108. Id. §§ 39-22-701 to 704 (1973 & Supp. 1983). <br /> 109. Id. § 36-10-108(1) (Supp. 1983). <br /> 110. Id. § 36-10-108. <br /> 111. Id. § 25-8-102(1) (1973). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.